Skip to main content

Bausch Health Companies Inc. vs Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.: Strategic Comparison

Direct Answer

Bausch Health Companies Inc. reported $10.3B (FY2025), while Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. reported ~$236.9B (FY2025). Revenue describes scale, not an overall winner.

Editorial research by Swet Parvadiya. Figures keep each company's fiscal year; amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Sources are listed below.

Share

Key Differences at a Glance

FieldBausch Health Companies Inc.Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Latest reported revenue$10.3B (FY2025)~$236.9B (FY2025)
Founded19941969
Employees20,300259,149
Market Cap$2.2B$1.33T
HeadquartersCanadaSouth Korea
Revenue / Employee$506k / employee$914k / employee
Valuation Multiple0.2x P/S5.6x P/S

Strategic Positioning

Business model and competitive context from the cited profiles

Bausch Health Companies Inc. Strategic Vector

FY2025 Revenue Baseline

Growth spending is subordinated to the balance sheet.

Productivity: $506k / employee

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Strategic Vector

FY2025 Revenue Baseline

Samsung's growth plan centers on AI memory: ramping HBM4 for Nvidia and AMD accelerators, developing HBM4E, and adding DRAM capacity at Pyeongtaek.

Productivity: $914k / employee

Bausch Health Companies Inc. vs Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Market Share

Bausch Health Companies Inc. market share
Xifaxan accounted for about 85% of Salix segment revenue in 2025 and more than 20% of company revenue, and no other product group reaches 10% of the segment. Arestin represents roughly 95% of Dentistry revenue. Solta Medical revenue is concentrated in skin tightening, driven by the Thermage line. By geography, the United States accounted for about 60% of 2025 revenue and China about 5%, with no other country above 5%.
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. market share
Samsung is the world's largest maker of DRAM and NAND memory and one of the two largest smartphone vendors by shipments, alongside Apple. It has been the top global TV brand for more than 18 consecutive years and is the second-largest contract chipmaker after TSMC.

Quick Stats Comparison

MetricBausch Health Companies Inc.Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Revenue$10.3B (FY2025)~$236.9B (FY2025)
Founded19941969
HeadquartersLaval, Quebec, CanadaSuwon, South Korea
Market Cap$2.2B$1.33T
Employees20,300259,149
Revenue / Employee$506k / employee$914k / employee
Valuation Multiple0.2x P/S5.6x P/S

Bausch Health Companies Inc. Revenue vs Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Revenue — Year by Year

YearBausch Health Companies Inc.Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Higher reported revenue
2025$10.3B~$236.9BSamsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (approx. USD)
2024$9.6B~$213.6BSamsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (approx. USD)
2023$8.8B~$183.8BSamsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (approx. USD)
2022$8.1B~$214.6BSamsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (approx. USD)
2021$8.4B~$198.5BSamsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (approx. USD)

Business Model Breakdown

Overview: Bausch Health Companies Inc. vs Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

This in-depth comparison examines Bausch Health Companies Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. across revenue, market value, business model, competitive positioning, and long-term growth strategy. Whether you are researching Bausch Health Companies Inc. on its own, evaluating Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., or weighing the two companies side by side, the breakdown below highlights where each company leads and where the gap between Bausch Health Companies Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. is widest.

On the headline numbers, Bausch Health Companies Inc. reports annual revenue of $10.3B against ~$236.9B for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., while their respective market capitalizations stand at $2.2B and $1.33T. Bausch Health Companies Inc. is headquartered in Canada and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. in South Korea, and those different home markets shape how each company competes.

Bausch Health Companies Inc.: Bausch Health is a Canadian specialty pharmaceutical and medical device company headquartered in Laval, Quebec, and incorporated in British Columbia. It was Valeant Pharmaceuticals until July 2018, and Valeant was the Wall Street favorite that collapsed in 2015 and 2016 over drug price increases, its Philidor mail-order pharmacy arrangement and the debt it had taken on to buy drugs. Today the company sells about 1,000 products in roughly 90 countries across Salix gastroenterology, International branded generics, Solta Medical aesthetic devices, Diversified Products and Bausch + Lomb, the eye-health business it listed separately in 2022 and still owns about 88% of.

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.: Samsung Electronics, based in Suwon, is the flagship company of the Samsung Group and South Korea's most valuable listed company. It is the world's largest memory chipmaker and one of the two largest smartphone vendors. Its market value passed $1 trillion in May 2026 and was about $1.33 trillion in late September 2026, after its shares more than tripled in a year on AI memory demand. The company is led by co-CEOs Jun Young-hyun (semiconductors) and TM Roh (devices), with Jay Y. Lee as Executive Chairman.

Business Models: How Bausch Health Companies Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Make Money

Bausch Health Companies Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. pursue distinct approaches to generating revenue, and understanding how each company operates is the foundation of any fair comparison between Bausch Health Companies Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd..

Bausch Health Companies Inc. business model: Bausch Health sells prescription medicines, over-the-counter products and medical devices in about 90 countries through five reportable segments. Salix sells gastrointestinal drugs in the United States and is built around Xifaxan, which brought in $2.212B in 2025, roughly 85% of the segment. Solta Medical sells Thermage, Fraxel, Clear + Brilliant and VASERlipo aesthetic systems to clinics and earns repeat revenue on single-use treatment consumables. The International segment sells branded generics and consumer-health brands such as Bedoyecta, Bisocard, Contrave and Espaven outside the United States. Diversified Products covers U.S. neuroscience, dermatology, generics and dentistry lines. Bausch + Lomb, about 88% owned and still consolidated, contributed $5.101B of 2025 revenue from contact lenses, lens care, ophthalmic drugs and surgical equipment. Three wholesalers accounted for most U.S. sales in 2025: Cencora at 18% of revenue, McKesson at 16% and Cardinal Health at 14%.

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. business model: Samsung earns money from two groups of businesses. Device Solutions (DS) makes and sells memory (DRAM, HBM, NAND), System LSI chips such as Exynos processors and ISOCELL image sensors, and contract foundry manufacturing. In Q2 2026, DS produced ~$90.5 billion (KRW 127.5 trillion) of the company's ~$122 billion (KRW 171.5 trillion) revenue and ~$63.3 billion (KRW 89.2 trillion) of its ~$63.5 billion (KRW 89.5 trillion) operating profit. Device eXperience (DX) sells Galaxy phones, tablets, wearables, TVs, monitors and home appliances, plus network equipment. Separately consolidated subsidiaries add OLED panels from Samsung Display, sold to Apple and other phone makers, and automotive and audio electronics from Harman.

Competitive Advantage: Bausch Health Companies Inc. vs Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

The durability of a company's moat often decides long-term winners. Here is how the competitive advantages of Bausch Health Companies Inc. stack up against those of Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd..

Bausch Health Companies Inc. competitive advantage: Bausch Health's strongest asset is Bausch + Lomb, the 1853-founded eye-health business it bought in 2013, listed on the NYSE and TSX in May 2022 and still owns about 88% of. That segment generated $5.101B of revenue in 2025 across contact lenses, lens care, ophthalmic pharmaceuticals and surgical equipment. In gastroenterology, Xifaxan holds a decade of outcomes data in reducing the risk of overt hepatic encephalopathy recurrence and in irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea, supported by direct-to-consumer advertising and a specialist sales force calling on gastroenterologists and hepatologists. Solta Medical adds an installed base of Thermage and Fraxel systems that pulls recurring consumable sales, and the International segment sells roughly 1,000 products through established pharmacy channels in Poland, Mexico, Canada and other markets.

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. competitive advantage: Samsung's edge is manufacturing scale and breadth. It is the largest memory producer and one of only three major DRAM makers, alongside SK hynix and Micron. That lets it capture pricing upswings like the 2026 AI-driven shortage. It also owns component businesses (memory, OLED through Samsung Display, image sensors) that sell to rivals as well as to its own Galaxy devices, so it earns money even when competitors' products win.

Growth Strategy: Where Bausch Health Companies Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Are Headed

Future prospects matter as much as current results. The growth strategies below explain how Bausch Health Companies Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. each plan to expand from here.

Bausch Health Companies Inc. growth strategy: Growth spending is subordinated to the balance sheet. Bausch Health refinanced $9.6B of debt in 2025 to push out near- and medium-term maturities and directs cash flow to debt reduction, generating $1.2B of adjusted cash flow from operations for the year. Within that constraint it invests in Xifaxan direct-to-consumer advertising and sales force capacity, bought DURECT in September 2025 for about $63M upfront plus up to $350M in milestones to add larsucosterol, and is widening Solta Medical distribution, including the December 2025 purchase of Shibo Zhenmei's aesthetics distribution business in China. The Bausch + Lomb separation remains the largest potential source of value, and it is conditioned on hitting targeted leverage ratios rather than on a fixed timetable.

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. growth strategy: Samsung's growth plan centers on AI memory: ramping HBM4 for Nvidia and AMD accelerators, developing HBM4E, and adding DRAM capacity at Pyeongtaek. In foundry it is pursuing 2nm gate-all-around production and building its Taylor, Texas fab to win customers from TSMC. On the device side it relies on Galaxy AI features, foldables and premium TVs to defend share against Apple and Chinese brands.

Financial Picture: Bausch Health Companies Inc. vs Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

A closer look at the financial trajectory of Bausch Health Companies Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. rounds out the comparison.

Bausch Health Companies Inc.: FY2025 revenue was $10.266B, up $641M or 7% over 2024, split between product sales of $10.156B and other revenue of $110M. Operating costs included cost of goods sold of $2.949B, selling, general and administrative expense of $3.438B, research and development of $629M and intangible amortization of $1.001B, plus $145M of goodwill impairments in the Generics reporting unit. Income before income taxes was $367M and net income attributable to Bausch Health was $157M, against a $46M loss in 2024, helped by a $139M larger gain on debt extinguishment and held back by interest expense of $1.604B, up 16%. Debt remains the dominant line item: $20.232B of principal outstanding at December 31, 2025, or $20.817B including unamortised premiums, discounts and issuance costs, with maturities of $58M in 2026, $701M in 2027, $4.240B in 2028, $1.662B in 2029, $4.118B in 2030 and $9.453B thereafter. During 2025 the company refinanced $9.6B of debt, including April 2025 transactions that put in place a $3.0B term loan B due October 2030, a $500M revolving facility due April 2030 and $4.4B of 10.00% senior secured notes, and a $1.7B exchange offer in the fourth quarter. The first quarter of 2026 then carried a $1.426B goodwill impairment at Salix after the RED-C trial results.

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.: Samsung's earnings follow the memory cycle. Revenue fell from ~$215 billion (KRW 302.2 trillion) in 2022 to ~$184 billion (KRW 258.9 trillion) in 2023 during a chip downturn, then recovered to ~$214 billion (KRW 300.9 trillion) in 2024 and ~$237 billion (KRW 333.6 trillion) in 2025, when net income reached about $31.5 billion (KRW 44.3 trillion). In 2026, AI server demand created a memory shortage. Q1 operating profit of ~$40.6 billion (KRW 57.2 trillion) exceeded the full-year 2025 total, and Q2 reached ~$63.5 billion (KRW 89.5 trillion) on ~$122 billion (KRW 171.5 trillion) revenue. Higher memory costs also squeezed Samsung's own devices: the MX and Networks unit lost ~$497 million (KRW 0.7 trillion) in Q2 2026 on ~$23.6 billion (KRW 33.2 trillion) revenue.

Company-Specific SWOT Notes

Bausch Health Companies Inc.

Strength

Xifaxan generated $2.212B of revenue in 2025, about 85% of Salix segment revenue and over 20% of company revenue, supported by outcomes data in hepatic encephalopathy, direct-to-consumer advertising and a dedicated gastroenterology sales force.

Strength

Solta Medical sells capital equipment plus single-use treatment consumables, so each installed Thermage or Fraxel system generates recurring revenue, and aesthetic treatments are paid for out of pocket rather than reimbursed.

Weakness

Principal debt was $20.232B at December 31, 2025 and interest expense was $1.604B for the year, against research and development spending of $629M.

Weakness

The company is still severely paralyzed by the massive $30 billion debt burden accumulated during the aggressive, disastrous acquisition spree orchestrated by former CEO J.

Opportunity

Solta Medical revenue grew 18% to $518M in 2025 and the company bought Shibo Zhenmei's Chinese distribution business in December 2025 to sell Thermage directly.

Threat

Bausch Health expects U.S. generic competition for Xifaxan in 2028 and is litigating Paragraph IV cases against Norwich, Amneal, Cipla and Ajanta.

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

Strength

As the largest DRAM maker, Samsung turned AI server demand into a record ~$63.5 billion (KRW 89.5 trillion) operating profit in Q2 2026.

Strength

Memory, OLED panels, image sensors, Galaxy devices, TVs and Harman give Samsung revenue from both rivals and consumers.

Weakness

DS produced nearly all Q2 2026 profit, while MX and Networks posted a ~$497 million (KRW 0.7 trillion) loss as memory costs rose.

Weakness

Despite massive capital expenditure, Samsung's contract manufacturing foundry business continues to lose share to TSMC in cutting-edge 3nm and 2nm nodes.

Opportunity

Volume HBM4 shipments and first HBM4E samples position Samsung to gain share in high-margin AI memory.

Threat

A memory price downturn, SK hynix and Micron in HBM, TSMC in foundry, and US-China export controls all threaten margins.

Factual Scorecard

CategoryResultWhy
Same-period Revenue ScaleSamsung Electronics Co., Ltd.$10.3B (FY2025) versus ~$236.9B (FY2025); the higher figure is identified after approximate USD conversion.
Founded EarlierSamsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Bausch Health Companies Inc. was founded in 1994; Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. was founded in 1969.
Verdict

Comparison Takeaway: Bausch Health Companies Inc. vs Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

Bausch Health Companies Inc. reported $10.3B (FY2025), while Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. reported ~$236.9B (FY2025). Revenue describes scale, not an overall winner. Compare the same reporting period and the metric relevant to the question—revenue, profitability, growth, product fit, or market value—rather than treating them as one composite score.

Methodology and sourcing reviewed by Swet Parvadiya. No date is shown unless this comparison has its own editorial review date.

Frequently Asked Questions: Bausch Health Companies Inc. vs Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

Which company was founded first, Bausch Health Companies Inc. or Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.?

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. was founded in 1969; Bausch Health Companies Inc. was founded in 1994.

What revenue did Bausch Health Companies Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. report?

Bausch Health Companies Inc. reported $10.3B (FY2025), while Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. reported ~$236.9B (FY2025). These figures describe reported scale; they do not by themselves determine an overall winner.

How do Bausch Health Companies Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. make money?

Bausch Health Companies Inc.: Bausch Health sells prescription medicines, over-the-counter products and medical devices in about 90 countries through five reportable segments. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.: Samsung earns money from two groups of businesses.

Which is better, Bausch Health Companies Inc. or Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.?

There is no evidence-based single winner. Compare Bausch Health Companies Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. on the same fiscal period and the metric relevant to the question, such as revenue, profitability, growth, product fit, or market value.

Sources & References

Cite This Page

Automatically generated citations for researchers.

APA Format

CorpDigest. (2026). Bausch Health Companies Inc. vs Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Comparison. from https://corpdigest.com/compare/bausch-health-vs-samsung

MLA Format

CorpDigest. "Bausch Health Companies Inc. vs Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Comparison." CorpDigest, 2026, https://corpdigest.com/compare/bausch-health-vs-samsung.

Chicago Format

CorpDigest. "Bausch Health Companies Inc. vs Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Comparison." CorpDigest. 2026. https://corpdigest.com/compare/bausch-health-vs-samsung.

Content is for informational purposes only. Not financial advice. Data sourced from SEC filings, annual reports, and public records. See our full disclaimer and methodology.