Atlassian vs Samsung: Revenue, Profit and Business Model
Atlassian reported $6.6B of revenue in FY2026 and a net loss of $53.8M. Samsung reported ~$236.9B of revenue in FY2025 and ~$31.4B of net income.
Latest financial snapshot
Financial summary
Atlassian
Atlassian's fiscal 2026 revenue was $6.57 billion, up 26%, with Cloud at $4.41 billion (up 28%), Data Center at $1.83 billion (up 25%), and Marketplace and other at $330.7 million. Subscription annual recurring revenue reached $6.6 billion, up 23%. The company is still unprofitable under GAAP, but the gap is narrowing: the net loss fell to $53.8 million from $256.7 million, and GAAP operating income was positive for the first time, at $10.4 million. Stock-based compensation of $1.61 billion, 24% of revenue, is most of what separates that result from $1.32 billion of free cash flow. Research and development absorbed $3.27 billion, half of revenue, against $1.54 billion for marketing and sales. Cash and cash equivalents ended the year at $1.24 billion, after $1.23 billion of cash paid for the Browser Company and DX acquisitions and $1.81 billion of Class A share repurchases, against $989.6 million of long-term debt.
Samsung
Samsung's earnings follow the memory cycle. Revenue fell from ~$215 billion (KRW 302.2 trillion) in 2022 to ~$184 billion (KRW 258.9 trillion) in 2023 during a chip downturn, then recovered to ~$214 billion (KRW 300.9 trillion) in 2024 and ~$237 billion (KRW 333.6 trillion) in 2025, when net income reached about $31.5 billion (KRW 44.3 trillion). In 2026, AI server demand created a memory shortage. Q1 operating profit of ~$40.6 billion (KRW 57.2 trillion) exceeded the full-year 2025 total, and Q2 reached ~$63.5 billion (KRW 89.5 trillion) on ~$122 billion (KRW 171.5 trillion) revenue. Higher memory costs also squeezed Samsung's own devices: the MX and Networks unit lost ~$497 million (KRW 0.7 trillion) in Q2 2026 on ~$23.6 billion (KRW 33.2 trillion) revenue.
Revenue and profit by year
Atlassian
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Growth | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2026 | $6.6B | -$53.8M | -0.8% | +26.0% | Source |
| FY2025 | $5.2B | -$256.7M | -4.9% | +19.7% | Source |
| FY2024 | $4.4B | -$300.5M | -6.9% | +23.3% | Source |
| FY2023 | $3.5B | -$486.8M | -13.8% | +26.1% | Source |
| FY2022 | $2.8B | -$519.5M | -18.5% | +34.2% | Source |
| FY2021 | $2.1B | -$579M | -27.7% | +29.4% | Source |
| FY2020 | $1.6B | -$350.7M | -21.7% | +33.4% | Source |
| FY2019 | $1.2B | -$637.6M | -52.7% | +38.5% | Source |
| FY2018 | $874M | -$113.4M | -13.0% | +41.0% | Source |
| FY2017 | $619.9M | -$37.4M | -6.0% | +35.6% | Source |
| FY2016 | $457.1M | $4.4M | 1.0% | — | Source |
Samsung
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Growth | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | ~$236.9B | ~$31.4B | 13.3% | +10.9% | Source |
| FY2024 | ~$213.6B | ~$23.9B | 11.2% | +16.2% | Source |
| FY2023 | ~$183.8B | ~$10.3B | 5.6% | -14.3% | Source |
| FY2022 | ~$214.6B | ~$38.9B | 18.1% | +8.1% | Source |
| FY2021 | ~$198.5B | ~$27.9B | 14.0% | — | Source |
Where the revenue comes from
Atlassian
- Cloud subscriptions~67%
Per-user cloud subscriptions for Jira, Confluence, Jira Service Management, Trello, Bitbucket, Loom, and Rovo across Free, Standard, Premium, and Enterprise editions. Cloud revenue was $4.41 billion in fiscal 2026, up 28%, and reached $1.21 billion in the fourth quarter alone.
- Data Center subscriptions~28%
On-premises term licenses with bundled support for self-managed deployments of Jira, Confluence, and other products. Data Center revenue was $1.83 billion in fiscal 2026, up 25%, but Atlassian announced the end of life of the line in September 2025: no new customers from March 2026, no expansions for existing customers after March 2028, and no maintenance after March 2029.
- Marketplace and other~5%
Fees from third-party app sales through the Atlassian Marketplace, which carries more than 6,000 apps and integrations, plus premier support, advisory, and training services. Marketplace and other revenue was $330.7 million in fiscal 2026, up 10%.
Samsung
- Memory semiconductors
- Foundry and system LSI
- Galaxy smartphones and mobile devices
- Display panels
- TVs and appliances
- Network equipment
- Harman automotive and audio
Business model and strategy
Atlassian
How it makes money
Atlassian runs a land-and-expand B2B SaaS model. A small team, usually in engineering, adopts Jira, Confluence, Bitbucket, or Trello through a free edition or a self-service purchase. Because the tools connect to each other and to outside systems, use spreads to other departments such as IT, marketing, and HR.
Growth strategy
Atlassian's growth strategy has three parts. It pushes beyond engineering with Jira Service Management, aimed at the IT, HR, and customer-service desks that ServiceNow and Freshworks serve. It packages products into Collections, bundles sold around an outcome rather than per app, covering teamwork, software, service, and strategy.
Competitive advantage
Atlassian's moat is switching cost. Jira is often criticized for complexity, but it holds years of issue history, workflow configuration, and integrations with code repositories and CI systems, so replacing it means rebuilding how an engineering organization records its work.
Samsung
How it makes money
Samsung earns money from two groups of businesses. Device Solutions (DS) makes and sells memory (DRAM, HBM, NAND), System LSI chips such as Exynos processors and ISOCELL image sensors, and contract foundry manufacturing.
Growth strategy
Samsung's growth plan centers on AI memory: ramping HBM4 for Nvidia and AMD accelerators, developing HBM4E, and adding DRAM capacity at Pyeongtaek. In foundry it is pursuing 2nm gate-all-around production and building its Taylor, Texas fab to win customers from TSMC. On the device side it relies on Galaxy AI features, foldables and premium TVs to defend share against Apple and Chinese brands.
Competitive advantage
Samsung's edge is manufacturing scale and breadth. It is the largest memory producer and one of only three major DRAM makers, alongside SK hynix and Micron. That lets it capture pricing upswings like the 2026 AI-driven shortage.
Questions about Atlassian vs Samsung
Which company has higher revenue — Atlassian Corporation or Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.?
Atlassian Corporation reported $6.6B (FY2026), while Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. reported ~$236.9B (FY2025). By last reported revenue, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. is the larger business, with Atlassian Corporation reporting a smaller revenue base. Note: these are from different fiscal years and are not a direct like-for-like comparison.
What is the market cap of Atlassian Corporation vs Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.?
Atlassian Corporation's market capitalisation stands at $45.4B, while Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.'s is $1.33T. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. carries the higher market valuation, reflecting investors' expectations of its future earnings power relative to Atlassian Corporation.
Which is more financially efficient — Atlassian Corporation or Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.?
Atlassian Corporation generates $494k / employee in revenue per employee, while Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. generates $914k / employee. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. shows higher revenue efficiency per headcount, though this reflects business model differences — capital-light software companies routinely outperform labour-intensive manufacturers on this metric.
How do Atlassian Corporation and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. make money?
Atlassian Corporation and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. generate revenue in fundamentally different ways. Atlassian Corporation: Atlassian runs a land-and-expand B2B SaaS model. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.: Samsung earns money from two groups of businesses.
Which company is valued higher relative to revenue — Atlassian Corporation or Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.?
On a price-to-sales (P/S) basis, Atlassian Corporation trades at 6.9x P/S and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. at 5.6x P/S. Atlassian Corporation commands a higher revenue multiple, typically indicating that investors expect faster growth or higher future margins compared to Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. A higher multiple is not inherently better — it may also signal that the stock is priced for perfection.
Is Atlassian Corporation bigger than Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.?
By last reported revenue, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (~$236.9B (FY2025)) is the larger company compared to Atlassian Corporation ($6.6B (FY2026)). Revenue scale is one dimension of size — market capitalisation, employee count, and geographic reach are also relevant depending on the context.
Figures come from each company's filings and the sources linked beside them. Amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Back to the Atlassian vs Samsung overview