Skip to main content

ASML Holding NV vs SpaceX: Strategic Comparison

Direct Answer

ASML Holding NV reported ~$36.9B (FY2025), while SpaceX reported $18.7B (FY2025). Revenue describes scale, not an overall winner.

Editorial research by Swet Parvadiya. Figures keep each company's fiscal year; amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Sources are listed below.

Share

Key Differences at a Glance

FieldASML Holding NVSpaceX
Latest reported revenue~$36.9B (FY2025)$18.7B (FY2025)
Founded19842002
Employees44,20922,621
Market Cap$696.4B$1.92T
HeadquartersNetherlandsUnited States
Revenue / Employee$835k / employee$826k / employee
Valuation Multiple18.9x P/S102.8x P/S

Strategic Positioning

Business model and competitive context from the cited profiles

ASML Holding NV Strategic Vector

FY2025 Revenue Baseline

Growth depends on how fast chipmakers add advanced capacity and on how quickly ASML can build systems.

Productivity: $835k / employee

SpaceX Strategic Vector

FY2025 Revenue Baseline

SpaceX's growth plan has four parts: add Starlink subscribers and raise enterprise, aviation, and mobile revenue; launch higher-capacity Starlink V3 satellites on Starship; expand national-security work through Starshield and launch contracts (over $6 billion in U.S. government awards in Q2 2026); and scale AI compute capacity, which grew from 400 megawatts a year earlier to 1.4 gigawatts at the end of Q2 2026.

Productivity: $826k / employee

ASML Holding NV vs SpaceX Market Share

ASML Holding NV market share
ASML is the only supplier of EUV lithography systems, so its share of that segment is complete, and its DUV immersion systems are the volume workhorse of advanced chipmaking. Canon and Nikon remain in mature-node and specialty lithography. In 2025 ASML sold 535 systems, including 48 EUV units and 131 ArF immersion units, and 95 percent of all systems it has sold in the past 30 years were still active in the field at the end of the year.
SpaceX market share
SpaceX flies most of the world's orbital launches by count and operates the largest satellite constellation, with about 9,600 Starlink satellites in low Earth orbit as of March 31, 2026.

Quick Stats Comparison

MetricASML Holding NVSpaceX
Revenue~$36.9B (FY2025)$18.7B (FY2025)
Founded19842002
HeadquartersVeldhoven, NetherlandsStarbase, Texas; major operations in Hawthorne, California
Market Cap$696.4B$1.92T
Employees44,20922,621
Revenue / Employee$835k / employee$826k / employee
Valuation Multiple18.9x P/S102.8x P/S

ASML Holding NV Revenue vs SpaceX Revenue — Year by Year

YearASML Holding NVSpaceXHigher reported revenue
2025~$36.9B$18.7BASML Holding NV (approx. USD)
2024~$31.9B$14.0BASML Holding NV (approx. USD)
2023~$31.1B$10.4BASML Holding NV (approx. USD)
2022~$23.9BN/AOnly one figure available
2021~$21BN/AOnly one figure available

Business Model Breakdown

Overview: ASML Holding NV vs SpaceX

This in-depth comparison examines ASML Holding NV and SpaceX across revenue, market value, business model, competitive positioning, and long-term growth strategy. Whether you are researching ASML Holding NV on its own, evaluating SpaceX, or weighing the two companies side by side, the breakdown below highlights where each company leads and where the gap between ASML Holding NV and SpaceX is widest.

On the headline numbers, ASML Holding NV reports annual revenue of ~$36.9B against $18.7B for SpaceX, while their respective market capitalizations stand at $696.4B and $1.92T. ASML Holding NV is headquartered in Netherlands and SpaceX in United States, and those different home markets shape how each company competes.

ASML Holding NV: ASML is the most consequential technology company most consumers have never heard of. Based in Veldhoven in the Netherlands, it is the only supplier of extreme ultraviolet lithography machines, room-sized systems that use 13.5 nanometer light, plasma generated from molten tin, and mirrors polished to near-atomic smoothness to print circuit patterns onto silicon wafers. Without them, chipmakers such as TSMC, Samsung and Intel cannot manufacture the leading-edge logic and memory used in phones, data centers and AI accelerators. ASML sold 535 systems in 2025 and reported total net sales of ~$37 billion (32.7 billion euros).

SpaceX: SpaceX, based at Starbase, Texas, designs and launches reusable rockets and spacecraft and runs Starlink, the largest satellite constellation in orbit. Falcon 9 first-stage reuse, proven in 2015, cut launch costs and gave SpaceX most of the world's commercial launch market. Crew Dragon has flown NASA astronauts since 2020. In 2026 the company combined with xAI, went public on Nasdaq, and now reports Space, Connectivity, and AI segments.

Business Models: How ASML Holding NV and SpaceX Make Money

ASML Holding NV and SpaceX pursue distinct approaches to generating revenue, and understanding how each company operates is the foundation of any fair comparison between ASML Holding NV and SpaceX.

ASML Holding NV business model: ASML designs and assembles lithography systems, sells them to a small number of chipmakers, and then earns recurring revenue maintaining and upgrading the installed base. In 2025, net system sales were ~$27.7 billion (24.5 billion euros), or 74.9 percent of total net sales, and net service and field option sales were ~$9.27 billion (8.2 billion euros), or 25.1 percent. Customer concentration is extreme: four customers each accounted for more than 10 percent of 2025 net sales and together for 61.2 percent, while the single largest customer accounted for ~$8.81 billion (7.8 billion euros), or 23.9 percent. ASML works as a systems integrator rather than a vertically integrated manufacturer. It buys all lenses, mirrors, illuminators and collectors exclusively from Carl Zeiss SMT, in which it holds a 24.9 percent stake, and draws on a base of about 5,100 suppliers. Because systems take many months to build, customers pay substantial down payments before delivery.

SpaceX business model: SpaceX earns money in three segments. Space sells launches on Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy, plus Dragon cargo and crew missions for NASA, the U.S. government, and commercial customers ($962 million in Q2 2026). Connectivity sells Starlink subscriptions and terminals to consumers, plus enterprise, aviation, maritime, mobile, and Starshield government services ($4.3 billion in Q2 2026, the only segment with an operating profit). AI sells compute and cloud services from its data-center capacity ($2.6 billion in Q2 2026). Because SpaceX launches its own satellites, launch capacity directly feeds the recurring Starlink business.

Competitive Advantage: ASML Holding NV vs SpaceX

The durability of a company's moat often decides long-term winners. Here is how the competitive advantages of ASML Holding NV stack up against those of SpaceX.

ASML Holding NV competitive advantage: ASML's competitive advantage is the difficulty of building an EUV machine at all. The system fires a high-power laser at molten tin droplets roughly 50,000 times a second to create a plasma that emits 13.5 nanometer light, which cannot pass through glass or air and so must be steered by mirrors polished to near-atomic smoothness inside a vacuum. Those optics come only from Carl Zeiss SMT, under an exclusive arrangement, and ASML spent roughly two decades between the start of EUV research and the first production shipments in 2017 before the technology worked at commercial throughput. The company spent ~$5.31 billion (4.7 billion euros) on R&D in 2025 alone, 14.4 percent of sales, and coordinates about 5,100 suppliers to build the systems.

SpaceX competitive advantage: SpaceX's advantage is reusability combined with vertical integration. It builds its own engines, avionics, rockets, and satellites, and reflies Falcon 9 boosters many times, which lowers its marginal launch cost below rivals that still expend most hardware. Being its own largest launch customer lets it deploy Starlink at a cadence no other operator has matched, and Starlink revenue then funds Starship.

Growth Strategy: Where ASML Holding NV and SpaceX Are Headed

Future prospects matter as much as current results. The growth strategies below explain how ASML Holding NV and SpaceX each plan to expand from here.

ASML Holding NV growth strategy: Growth depends on how fast chipmakers add advanced capacity and on how quickly ASML can build systems. In EUV, the workhorse is the TWINSCAN NXE:3800E, whose higher productivity drove 2025 EUV sales and a large volume of field upgrades on installed systems; ASML recognized 44 NXE systems for ~$11.8 billion (10.4 billion euros) in 2025. The next step is the High-NA EXE platform, which raises numerical aperture from 0.33 to 0.55 and prints 8 nanometer features in a single exposure. ASML shipped its first full-specification EXE:5200B in April 2025 at 175 wafers per hour, 60 percent more productive than the EXE:5000, recognized four EXE systems for ~$1.36 billion (1.2 billion euros) in 2025, and expects the platform to support high-volume manufacturing from 2027. Beyond lithography, ASML is pushing multibeam e-beam inspection toward high-volume manufacturing, shipped its first advanced packaging system the TWINSCAN XT:260 in 2025 to address 3D integration, and invested ~$1.47 billion (1.3 billion euros) in Mistral AI for about 11 percent on a fully diluted basis to apply AI models across its products and operations. Service and field option sales, which grew 26.2 percent to ~$9.27 billion (8.2 billion euros) in 2025, expand automatically with the installed base.

SpaceX growth strategy: SpaceX's growth plan has four parts: add Starlink subscribers and raise enterprise, aviation, and mobile revenue; launch higher-capacity Starlink V3 satellites on Starship; expand national-security work through Starshield and launch contracts (over $6 billion in U.S. government awards in Q2 2026); and scale AI compute capacity, which grew from 400 megawatts a year earlier to 1.4 gigawatts at the end of Q2 2026.

Financial Picture: ASML Holding NV vs SpaceX

A closer look at the financial trajectory of ASML Holding NV and SpaceX rounds out the comparison.

ASML Holding NV: ASML's financial profile reflects a sole-source position in a concentrated market. In 2025 total net sales rose 15.6 percent to ~$37 billion (32.7 billion euros), gross profit was ~$19.5 billion (17.3 billion euros) for a gross margin of 52.8 percent, income from operations was ~$12.8 billion (11.3 billion euros), and net income was ~$10.8 billion (9.6 billion euros), a net margin of 29.4 percent, on basic earnings per share of 24.73 euros. R&D spending was ~$5.31 billion (4.7 billion euros), or 14.4 percent of sales, and selling, general and administrative costs were ~$1.47 billion (1.3 billion euros). Operating cash flow was ~$14.4 billion (12.7 billion euros) and free cash flow ~$12.4 billion (11.0 billion euros), helped by customer down payments received before systems are delivered. ASML returned ~$9.61 billion (8.5 billion euros) to shareholders in 2025, including ~$6.67 billion (5.9 billion euros) of share buybacks, and proposed an annualized dividend of 7.50 euros per share against 6.40 euros for 2024. It held ~$15 billion (13.3 billion euros) of cash and short-term investments at year end. The main financial exposures are the concentration of sales in a few customers and the export control regime covering China, which was 29.1 percent of 2025 sales.

SpaceX: SpaceX revenue grew from $10.387 billion in 2023 to $14.015 billion in 2024 and $18.674 billion in 2025, but heavy Starship, Starlink, and AI spending produced a $4.937 billion FY2025 net loss. In Q2 2026, its first quarter reported as a public company, revenue was $7.8 billion (up 92%), adjusted EBITDA was $3.5 billion, net loss was $541 million, and backlog was $47.5 billion. The IPO raised $85.7 billion and a $25 billion bond sale added more liquidity. In late September 2026 the stock traded near $145, for a market capitalization around $1.9 trillion.

Company-Specific SWOT Notes

ASML Holding NV

Strength

ASML is the only company able to build EUV lithography systems, so there is no substitute for its most advanced products.

Strength

ASML earned net income of ~$10.9 billion (9,609.4 million euros) on total net sales of ~$36.9 billion (32,667.3 million euros) in 2025, a net margin of 29.4 percent, with gross profit of ~$19.5 billion (17,258.0 million euros) for a gross margin of 52.8 percen

Weakness

ASML sells to a small number of buyers.

Weakness

ASML depends on about 5,100 suppliers, and on one of them without any alternative.

Opportunity

AI is the demand driver.

Threat

Export controls keep tightening.

SpaceX

Strength

Operational Falcon 9 booster reuse and in-house manufacturing give SpaceX the lowest marginal launch cost among major providers.

Strength

Connectivity revenue reached $4.3B in Q2 2026, up 66%, and was the only segment with an operating profit.

Weakness

FY2025 net loss was $4.937B, and Q2 2026 capex was about $18.4B, mostly for AI compute.

Weakness

A significant portion of launch revenue remains tied to NASA and DOD contracts, exposing the company to federal budget cycles and regulatory shifts.

Opportunity

A working Starship could launch much larger Starlink V3 satellites and expand mobile partnerships with carriers.

Threat

FAA licensing, orbital-debris scrutiny, Amazon Kuiper and Chinese constellations, and dependence on Elon Musk.

Factual Scorecard

CategoryResultWhy
Same-period Revenue ScaleASML Holding NV~$36.9B (FY2025) versus $18.7B (FY2025); the higher figure is identified after approximate USD conversion.
Founded EarlierASML Holding NVASML Holding NV was founded in 1984; SpaceX was founded in 2002.
Verdict

Comparison Takeaway: ASML Holding NV vs SpaceX

ASML Holding NV reported ~$36.9B (FY2025), while SpaceX reported $18.7B (FY2025). Revenue describes scale, not an overall winner. Compare the same reporting period and the metric relevant to the question—revenue, profitability, growth, product fit, or market value—rather than treating them as one composite score.

Methodology and sourcing reviewed by Swet Parvadiya. No date is shown unless this comparison has its own editorial review date.

Frequently Asked Questions: ASML Holding NV vs SpaceX

Which company was founded first, ASML Holding NV or SpaceX?

ASML Holding NV was founded in 1984; SpaceX was founded in 2002.

What revenue did ASML Holding NV and SpaceX report?

ASML Holding NV reported ~$36.9B (FY2025), while SpaceX reported $18.7B (FY2025). These figures describe reported scale; they do not by themselves determine an overall winner.

How do ASML Holding NV and SpaceX make money?

ASML Holding NV: ASML designs and assembles lithography systems, sells them to a small number of chipmakers, and then earns recurring revenue maintaining and upgrading the installed base. SpaceX: SpaceX earns money in three segments.

Which is better, ASML Holding NV or SpaceX?

There is no evidence-based single winner. Compare ASML Holding NV and SpaceX on the same fiscal period and the metric relevant to the question, such as revenue, profitability, growth, product fit, or market value.

Sources & References

Cite This Page

Automatically generated citations for researchers.

APA Format

CorpDigest. (2026). ASML Holding NV vs SpaceX Comparison. from https://corpdigest.com/compare/asml-holding-vs-spacex

MLA Format

CorpDigest. "ASML Holding NV vs SpaceX Comparison." CorpDigest, 2026, https://corpdigest.com/compare/asml-holding-vs-spacex.

Chicago Format

CorpDigest. "ASML Holding NV vs SpaceX Comparison." CorpDigest. 2026. https://corpdigest.com/compare/asml-holding-vs-spacex.

Content is for informational purposes only. Not financial advice. Data sourced from SEC filings, annual reports, and public records. See our full disclaimer and methodology.