Skip to main content

ASML Holding vs Microsoft: Revenue, Profit and Business Model

ASML Holding reported ~$36.9B of revenue in FY2025 and ~$10.9B of net income. Microsoft reported $331.8B of revenue in FY2026 and $133.7B of net income.

Latest financial snapshot

ASML Holding

Latest revenue
~$36.9B (FY2025)
Net income
~$10.9B
Net margin
29.4%
Revenue growth
+18.9% a year, FY2016–FY2025

Microsoft

Latest revenue
$331.8B (FY2026)
Net income
$133.7B
Net margin
40.3%
Revenue growth
+14.7% a year, FY2017–FY2026

Financial summary

ASML Holding

ASML's financial profile reflects a sole-source position in a concentrated market. In 2025 total net sales rose 15.6 percent to ~$37 billion (32.7 billion euros), gross profit was ~$19.5 billion (17.3 billion euros) for a gross margin of 52.8 percent, income from operations was ~$12.8 billion (11.3 billion euros), and net income was ~$10.8 billion (9.6 billion euros), a net margin of 29.4 percent, on basic earnings per share of 24.73 euros. R&D spending was ~$5.31 billion (4.7 billion euros), or 14.4 percent of sales, and selling, general and administrative costs were ~$1.47 billion (1.3 billion euros). Operating cash flow was ~$14.4 billion (12.7 billion euros) and free cash flow ~$12.4 billion (11.0 billion euros), helped by customer down payments received before systems are delivered. ASML returned ~$9.61 billion (8.5 billion euros) to shareholders in 2025, including ~$6.67 billion (5.9 billion euros) of share buybacks, and proposed an annualized dividend of 7.50 euros per share against 6.40 euros for 2024. It held ~$15 billion (13.3 billion euros) of cash and short-term investments at year end. The main financial exposures are the concentration of sales in a few customers and the export control regime covering China, which was 29.1 percent of 2025 sales.

Microsoft

Microsoft's FY2026 revenue rose 17.8% to $331.8 billion, operating income rose 21% to $155.2 billion, and GAAP net income rose 31% to $133.7 billion. Fourth-quarter revenue was $90.0 billion (up 18%) with net income of $35.8 billion, helped by a $3.2 billion gain on its Anthropic investment. Microsoft Cloud revenue reached $59.3 billion in Q4, up 27%. The main pressure point is capital intensity: AI data center spending has pushed free cash flow growth well below earnings growth.

Revenue and profit by year

ASML Holding

ASML Holding revenue, net income, margin and growth by fiscal year
YearRevenueNet incomeMarginGrowthSource
FY2025~$36.9B~$10.9B29.4%+15.6%Source
FY2024~$31.9B~$8.6B26.8%+2.6%Source
FY2023~$31.1B~$8.9B28.4%+30.2%Source
FY2022~$23.9B~$6.4B26.6%+13.8%Source
FY2021~$21B~$6.6B31.6%+33.1%Source
FY2020~$15.8B~$4B25.4%+18.3%Source
FY2019~$13.4B~$2.9B21.9%+8.0%Source
FY2018~$12.4B~$2.9B23.7%+22.1%Source
FY2017~$10.1B~$2.3B23.1%+30.4%Source
FY2016~$7.8B~$1.8B22.7%—Source
Full ASML Holding financials

Microsoft

Microsoft revenue, net income, margin and growth by fiscal year
YearRevenueNet incomeMarginGrowthSource
FY2026$331.8B$133.7B40.3%+17.8%Source
FY2025$281.7B$101.8B36.1%+14.9%Source
FY2024$245.1B$88.1B36.0%+15.7%Source
FY2023$211.9B$72.4B34.1%+6.9%Source
FY2022$198.3B$72.7B36.7%+18.0%Source
FY2021$168.1B$61.3B36.5%+17.5%Source
FY2020$143B$44.3B31.0%+13.6%Source
FY2019$125.8B$39.2B31.2%+14.0%Source
FY2018$110.4B$16.6B15.0%+14.3%Source
FY2017$96.6B$25.5B26.4%—Source
Full Microsoft financials

Where the revenue comes from

ASML Holding

  • DUV lithography system sales~37%

    Deep ultraviolet system sales were ~$13.6 billion (12,047.0 million euros) in 2025, or 36.9 percent of total net sales. The bulk is ArF immersion on the TWINSCAN NXT platform, 131 units for ~$11.7 billion (10,311.4 million euros), with dry ArF, KrF and i-line systems on the XT platform adding 148 units for ~$1.96 billion (1,735.6 million euros). DUV serves both advanced nodes in combination with multiple patterning and mature-node production for automotive, power and analog chips. China is the largest destination for mainstream DUV, and ASML said its China DUV business in 2025 was stronger than it had expected while mainstream demand elsewhere stayed weak.

  • EUV lithography system sales~36%

    Extreme ultraviolet system sales were ~$13.1 billion (11,602.7 million euros) in 2025, or 35.5 percent of total net sales, made up of 44 NXE systems for ~$11.8 billion (10,445.8 million euros) and four High-NA EXE systems for ~$1.31 billion (1,156.9 million euros). EUV is the segment where ASML has no competitor. Growth in 2025 came from the higher-productivity NXE:3800E in advanced logic and, increasingly, DRAM, where lower cost per exposure widened adoption. EUV also accounted for ~$28.8 billion (25.5 billion euros) of the ~$43.8 billion (38.8 billion euro) backlog at the end of 2025.

  • Service and field option sales~25%

    Net service and field option sales were ~$9.26 billion (8,193.0 million euros) in 2025, or 25.1 percent of total net sales, up 26.2 percent on 2024. This is maintenance, spare parts, remote support, refurbishment and performance upgrades sold into the installed base, and ASML reports it as a single category rather than splitting service from field options. Growth came from a larger installed base, higher tool use at some customers and a large volume of NXE:3800E field upgrades, which shifted part of what would have been new system revenue into installed base revenue.

  • Metrology and inspection systems~3%

    Metrology and inspection systems were ~$932 million (824.6 million euros) in 2025, or 2.5 percent of total net sales, across 208 units, up from 165 units and ~$729 million (645.5 million euros) in 2024. The category covers YieldStar optical metrology and HMI e-beam inspection. It is small in revenue terms but it supplies the measurement data that ASML's computational lithography software uses to tune scanner settings, which is why ASML sells it as part of a holistic lithography package rather than as standalone equipment.

Microsoft

  • Productivity And Business ProcessesMajor

    Office, Microsoft 365, LinkedIn, Dynamics, and related cloud services.

  • Intelligent CloudMajor

    Azure, server products, enterprise services, and cloud infrastructure.

  • More Personal ComputingMajor

    Windows, devices, gaming, search, and advertising.

  • AI Services And CopilotsGrowth

    AI features and model-powered services embedded across Azure, Microsoft 365, GitHub, security, and developer tools.

Business model and strategy

ASML Holding

How it makes money

ASML designs and assembles lithography systems, sells them to a small number of chipmakers, and then earns recurring revenue maintaining and upgrading the installed base. In 2025, net system sales were ~$27.7 billion (24.5 billion euros), or 74.9 percent of total net sales, and net service and field option sales were ~$9.27 billion (8.2 billion euros), or 25.1 percent.

Growth strategy

Growth depends on how fast chipmakers add advanced capacity and on how quickly ASML can build systems. In EUV, the workhorse is the TWINSCAN NXE:3800E, whose higher productivity drove 2025 EUV sales and a large volume of field upgrades on installed systems; ASML recognized 44 NXE systems for ~$11.8 billion (10.4 billion euros) in 2025.

Competitive advantage

ASML's competitive advantage is the difficulty of building an EUV machine at all. The system fires a high-power laser at molten tin droplets roughly 50,000 times a second to create a plasma that emits 13.5 nanometer light, which cannot pass through glass or air and so must be steered by mirrors polished to near-atomic smoothness inside a vacuum.

ASML Holding business model in full

Microsoft

How it makes money

Microsoft reports three segments. Intelligent Cloud covers Azure, SQL Server, Windows Server, GitHub, Nuance, and enterprise services; server products and cloud services alone brought in $129.4 billion in FY2026, and Azure passed $100 billion in annual revenue for the first time.

Growth strategy

Microsoft's growth plan centers on AI capacity and AI subscriptions. It is spending heavily on data centers and chips to meet Azure demand that management says remains capacity constrained, and it is selling Microsoft 365 Copilot as a paid add-on, which passed 30 million paid seats by the end of FY2026.

Competitive advantage

Microsoft's main advantage is distribution inside enterprises. Identity (Entra), email and documents (Microsoft 365), collaboration (Teams), developer tools (GitHub, Visual Studio), and cloud infrastructure (Azure) are often bought together, which raises switching costs and lets Microsoft attach new products such as Copilot to existing contracts.

Microsoft business model in full

Questions about ASML Holding vs Microsoft

Which company has higher revenue — ASML Holding NV or Microsoft Corporation?

ASML Holding NV reported ~$36.9B (FY2025), while Microsoft Corporation reported $331.8B (FY2026). By last reported revenue, Microsoft Corporation is the larger business, with ASML Holding NV reporting a smaller revenue base. Note: these are from different fiscal years and are not a direct like-for-like comparison.

What is the market cap of ASML Holding NV vs Microsoft Corporation?

ASML Holding NV's market capitalisation stands at $696.4B, while Microsoft Corporation's is $3.83T. Microsoft Corporation carries the higher market valuation, reflecting investors' expectations of its future earnings power relative to ASML Holding NV.

Which is more financially efficient — ASML Holding NV or Microsoft Corporation?

ASML Holding NV generates $835k / employee in revenue per employee, while Microsoft Corporation generates $1.49M / employee. Microsoft Corporation shows higher revenue efficiency per headcount, though this reflects business model differences — capital-light software companies routinely outperform labour-intensive manufacturers on this metric.

How do ASML Holding NV and Microsoft Corporation make money?

ASML Holding NV and Microsoft Corporation generate revenue in fundamentally different ways. ASML Holding NV: ASML designs and assembles lithography systems, sells them to a small number of chipmakers, and then earns recurring revenue maintaining and upgrading the installed base. Microsoft Corporation: Microsoft reports three segments.

Which company is valued higher relative to revenue — ASML Holding NV or Microsoft Corporation?

On a price-to-sales (P/S) basis, ASML Holding NV trades at 18.9x P/S and Microsoft Corporation at 11.5x P/S. ASML Holding NV commands a higher revenue multiple, typically indicating that investors expect faster growth or higher future margins compared to Microsoft Corporation. A higher multiple is not inherently better — it may also signal that the stock is priced for perfection.

Is ASML Holding NV bigger than Microsoft Corporation?

By last reported revenue, Microsoft Corporation ($331.8B (FY2026)) is the larger company compared to ASML Holding NV (~$36.9B (FY2025)). Revenue scale is one dimension of size — market capitalisation, employee count, and geographic reach are also relevant depending on the context.

Figures come from each company's filings and the sources linked beside them. Amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Back to the ASML Holding vs Microsoft overview

Content is for informational purposes only. Not financial advice. Data sourced from SEC filings, annual reports, and public records. See our full disclaimer and methodology.