Anthropic vs Hugging Face: Revenue, Profit and Business Model
Anthropic reported $65B of revenue in FY2026 and — of net income. Hugging Face reported $150M of revenue in FY2026 and — of net income.
Latest financial snapshot
Anthropic
- Latest revenue
- $65B (FY2026)
- Net income
- —
- Net margin
- 0.0%
- Revenue growth
- +1197.7% a year, FY2024–FY2026
Hugging Face
- Latest revenue
- $150M (FY2026)
- Net income
- —
- Net margin
- 0.0%
- Revenue growth
- —
Financial summary
Anthropic
Anthropic's draft IPO prospectus, described by Reuters on September 28, 2026, shows 2025 revenue of $4.59 billion against $386 million in 2024, an operating loss of $8.06 billion (from $2.98 billion) and a GAAP net loss of $41.97 billion (from $8.31 billion). About $34 billion of that loss was a non-cash charge tied to convertible financing from Google and Amazon rather than cash burn. Operating expenses reached $12.65 billion, including $7.33 billion of compute and infrastructure, and the company ended 2025 with $20.28 billion of cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments. Growth since then has outpaced the annual accounts: run-rate revenue was $14 billion in February 2026, crossed $47 billion in May, reached about $65 billion in July, and second-quarter revenue of $11.5 billion came with the first positive adjusted operating income. Funding followed the same curve, from a $13 billion Series F at a $183 billion valuation in September 2025 to a $30 billion Series G at $380 billion in February 2026 and a $65 billion Series H at $965 billion in May 2026.
Hugging Face
Hugging Face does not publish financial statements. Outside estimates and reporting put its annualized revenue at about $150 million in mid-2026 (The Information), and Delangue told TechCrunch in July 2026 that the company was close to profitability. It raised roughly $400 million in total, the largest round being a $235 million Series D in August 2023 at a $4.5 billion valuation from Salesforce Ventures, Google, Amazon, Nvidia, AMD, Intel, Qualcomm, IBM, and Sound Ventures. According to the Financial Times, it turned down a $500 million Nvidia investment at a $7 billion valuation in late 2025. In September 2026 Nvidia agreed to pay $12.93 billion for the whole company: about $11.9 billion to stockholders plus up to about $1.0 billion in equity retention awards for employees, roughly 86 times annualized revenue.
Revenue and profit by year
Anthropic
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Growth | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2026 | $65B | — | 0.0% | +1316.1% | Source |
| FY2025 | $4.6B | -$42B | -914.4% | +1089.1% | Source |
| FY2024 | $386M | -$8.3B | -2152.8% | — | Source |
Hugging Face
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Growth | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2026 | $150M | — | 0.0% | — | Source |
Where the revenue comes from
Anthropic
- Developer and enterprise API consumption
Token-billed access to the Claude models through the Claude Developer Platform, with prompt caching priced at $0.20 per million tokens on Claude Opus 5.5 to make long agent loops affordable. Anthropic does not publish a segment split; the two largest customers each accounted for about 12 percent of 2025 revenue.
- Agent products
Claude Code and Cowork are sold to individuals, teams and enterprises. Claude Code passed $1 billion of run-rate revenue in December 2025 and $2.5 billion by February 2026, when enterprises accounted for more than half of its revenue.
- Seat subscriptions
Claude Pro, Max, Team and Enterprise plans for individuals and organizations, including HIPAA-eligible enterprise deployments since January 2026.
- Cloud marketplace resale
Claude is sold through Amazon Bedrock, Google Cloud Vertex AI and Microsoft Azure Foundry, which lets customers spend committed cloud budget on Claude.
Hugging Face
- Enterprise Hub Subscriptions~50%
Tiered enterprise seats and corporate licenses providing private model repositories, SOC2 compliance, audit logs, and SSO.
- Serverless Inference Endpoints~30%
Pay-as-you-go GPU compute billing for deploying scalable production machine learning APIs on dedicated cloud hardware.
- Spaces Hardware Rentals & Pro Accounts~20%
Hourly compute fees for upgrading interactive Gradio Spaces to dedicated Nvidia A100/H100 GPUs and developer Pro subscriptions.
Business model and strategy
Anthropic
How it makes money
Anthropic charges for Claude in four ways. Developers and enterprises pay per million tokens on the Claude API, where cache reads cost far less than fresh input ($0.20 per million against $4 on Claude Opus 5.5). Individuals and teams pay subscriptions across Claude Pro, Max, Team and Enterprise plans.
Growth strategy
Growth runs through three channels. First, agent products: Claude Code went from internal experiment to general availability in May 2025 and over $2.5 billion of run-rate revenue by February 2026, and Cowork extended the same engine to non-technical work in January 2026. Second, cloud co-selling, with Claude the only frontier model on Amazon Bedrock, Google Cloud Vertex AI and Microsoft Azure Foundry.
Competitive advantage
Anthropic leads on agentic coding and long-horizon tasks. Claude Opus 5.5, released September 22, 2026, tops Anthropic's published benchmark table on SWE-bench Pro (89.9 percent) and Terminal-Bench 4.0 (66.4 percent) while costing $4 per million input tokens and $20 per million output tokens, roughly 40 percent less to run than Opus 5.
Hugging Face
How it makes money
Hugging Face gives away its core platform and libraries and charges for the things companies need once they put open models into production. Public model and dataset hosting is free.
Growth strategy
Hugging Face grows by being the first place open models land and then selling the tools to use them. Recent moves include buying Argilla (data curation) and XetHub (large-file storage) in 2024, buying humanoid robot maker Pollen Robotics in April 2025 and launching the low-cost Reachy Mini robot in July 2025, publishing its own small open models (SmolLM, SmolVLM), and routing Hub users to third-party inference provid…
Competitive advantage
Hugging Face's advantage is a network effect that is hard to copy. Major open-weight models from Meta, Mistral, Alibaba's Qwen team, DeepSeek, Google, and Nvidia are published on the Hub, so developers go there first, which in turn makes it the first place new models are released.
Questions about Anthropic vs Hugging Face
Which company has higher revenue — Anthropic PBC or Hugging Face, Inc.?
Anthropic PBC reported $65.0B (FY2026), while Hugging Face, Inc. reported $150.0M (FY2026). By last reported revenue, Anthropic PBC is the larger business, with Hugging Face, Inc. reporting a smaller revenue base.
Which is more financially efficient — Anthropic PBC or Hugging Face, Inc.?
Anthropic PBC generates $26.00M / employee in revenue per employee. A comparable figure for Hugging Face, Inc. requires matching employee and revenue data from the same reporting period.
How do Anthropic PBC and Hugging Face, Inc. make money?
Anthropic PBC and Hugging Face, Inc. generate revenue in fundamentally different ways. Anthropic PBC: Anthropic charges for Claude in four ways. Hugging Face, Inc.: Hugging Face gives away its core platform and libraries and charges for the things companies need once they put open models into production.
Is Anthropic PBC bigger than Hugging Face, Inc.?
By last reported revenue, Anthropic PBC ($65.0B (FY2026)) is the larger company compared to Hugging Face, Inc. ($150.0M (FY2026)). Revenue scale is one dimension of size — market capitalisation, employee count, and geographic reach are also relevant depending on the context.
Figures come from each company's filings and the sources linked beside them. Amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Back to the Anthropic vs Hugging Face overview