Skip to main content

Amgen vs Target: Revenue, Profit and Business Model

Amgen reported $36.8B of revenue in FY2025 and $7.7B of net income. Target reported $104.8B of revenue in FY2025 and $3.7B of net income.

Latest financial snapshot

Amgen

Latest revenue
$36.8B (FY2025)
Net income
$7.7B
Net margin
21.0%
Revenue growth
+5.4% a year, FY2016–FY2025

Target

Latest revenue
$104.8B (FY2025)
Net income
$3.7B
Net margin
3.5%
Revenue growth
+4.5% a year, FY2016–FY2025

Financial summary

Amgen

Amgen is a cash-generative business with high product gross margins. In fiscal 2025 it reported US$36.8 billion of total revenues, US$7.7 billion of GAAP net income, a 25.8% GAAP operating margin, US$8.1 billion of free cash flow and US$5.1 billion of dividends paid. Its results used to depend on a few large franchises, first Epogen and Aranesp, then Enbrel. As those matured Amgen bought revenue instead: Onyx in 2013, Otezla in 2019 and Horizon Therapeutics for US$27.8 billion in 2023. That last deal is also the main reason for the balance sheet it now carries, with US$54.6 billion of debt outstanding at December 31, 2025, debt leverage of about 3.2 times EBITDA and US$2.8 billion of net interest expense in fiscal 2025.

Target

Target's revenue fell three years in a row, from $109.1 billion in fiscal 2022 to $104.8 billion in fiscal 2025, while FY2025 net income was $3.705 billion. Fiscal 2026 has reversed the trend so far. Q2 FY2026 net sales rose 5.3% to $26.5 billion, comparable sales grew 3.8% on a 3.6% traffic gain, and digital comparable sales rose 8.7% with same-day delivery up more than 25%. Q2 GAAP EPS was $4.11 versus $2.05 a year earlier, but $1.65 of that came from $994 million of pretax tariff refunds; excluding refunds, EPS grew about 20%. Management now guides to roughly 5% net sales growth for fiscal 2026 and EPS of $9.90 to $10.90.

Revenue and profit by year

Amgen

Amgen revenue, net income, margin and growth by fiscal year
YearRevenueNet incomeMarginGrowthSource
FY2025$36.8B$7.7B21.0%+10.0%Source
FY2024$33.4B$4.1B12.2%+18.6%Source
FY2023$28.2B$6.7B23.8%+7.1%Source
FY2022$26.3B$6.6B24.9%+1.3%Source
FY2021$26B$5.9B22.7%+2.2%Source
FY2020$25.4B$7.3B28.6%+8.8%Source
FY2019$23.4B$7.8B33.6%-1.6%Source
FY2018$23.7B$8.4B35.3%+3.9%Source
FY2017$22.8B$2B8.7%-0.6%Source
FY2016$23B$7.7B33.6%—Source
Full Amgen financials

Target

Target revenue, net income, margin and growth by fiscal year
YearRevenueNet incomeMarginGrowthSource
FY2025$104.8B$3.7B3.5%-1.7%Source
FY2024$106.6B$4.1B3.8%-0.8%Source
FY2023$107.4B$4.1B3.9%-1.6%Source
FY2022$109.1B$2.8B2.5%+2.9%Source
FY2021$106B$6.9B6.6%+13.3%Source
FY2020$93.6B$4.4B4.7%+19.8%Source
FY2019$78.1B$3.3B4.2%+3.7%Source
FY2018$75.4B$2.9B3.9%+3.6%Source
FY2017$72.7B$2.9B4.0%+3.5%Source
FY2016$70.3B$2.7B3.9%—Source
Full Target financials

Where the revenue comes from

Amgen

  • U.S. product sales

    ~70% of total revenues

    United States product sales were US$25.66 billion in fiscal 2025, 73% of the US$35.15 billion product sales total and about 70% of total revenues. The largest domestic contributors were Prolia (US$2.98 billion), Enbrel (US$2.20 billion), Otezla (US$1.84 billion), Tepezza (US$1.76 billion), Repatha (US$1.66 billion), Evenity (US$1.60 billion) and Tezspire (US$1.48 billion). Access depends on formulary placement with the large pharmacy benefit managers and on Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement.

  • International product sales

    ~26% of total revenues

    Product sales outside the United States were US$9.49 billion in fiscal 2025, 27% of product sales. The largest were Repatha (US$1.35 billion), Aranesp (US$973 million), XGEVA (US$729 million), Vectibix (US$571 million) and Amgevita (US$549 million). Prices are generally lower than in the United States because of government reference pricing and national formulary negotiation.

  • Biosimilars

    ~8% of total revenues

    Biosimilars sit inside product sales and generated about US$3.0 billion in fiscal 2025: Mvasi (bevacizumab) US$771 million, Pavblu (aflibercept) US$700 million, Amjevita and Amgevita (adalimumab) US$597 million, Wezlana and Wezenla (ustekinumab) US$273 million, and US$683 million across the smaller biosimilars reported within other products. Amjevita sales fell 22% year over year, so segment growth now comes from the newer launches.

  • Rare disease portfolio acquired with Horizon

    ~13% of total revenues

    Also inside product sales, the medicines acquired with Horizon Therapeutics produced about US$4.6 billion in fiscal 2025: Tepezza US$1.90 billion, Krystexxa US$1.34 billion, Uplizna US$655 million and the ultra-rare products US$719 million. Uplizna grew 73% after approvals in IgG4-related disease and generalized myasthenia gravis, while the ultra-rare group fell 5% as Ravicti met generic competition.

  • Other revenues

    ~4% of total revenues

    Other revenues, mainly royalties, license income and corporate partner payments, were US$1.60 billion in fiscal 2025, the difference between US$36.75 billion of total revenues and US$35.15 billion of product sales. The line carries high margins but is not a growth priority.

Target

  • Stores and digital merchandise

    Primary revenue source

    Sales of food, essentials, apparel, beauty, home, electronics, toys and seasonal products through stores and digital channels.

  • Owned brands

    Strategic margin driver

    Target-owned and exclusive brands that support margin and differentiation.

  • Same-day services and Shipt

    Growth and retention stream

    Delivery, pickup, Drive Up and Target Circle 360 services that deepen loyalty.

  • Roundel retail media

    High-margin supplemental stream

    Advertising revenue from brands using Target's retail media network.

Business model and strategy

Amgen

How it makes money

Amgen operates a high-risk, high-reward biopharmaceutical business model. It spends heavily on research to discover and engineer new biologic drugs: US$7.3 billion in fiscal 2025, or 20.7% of product sales. Once a drug is approved by the FDA, Amgen secures a patent, granting them a temporary monopoly to sell the drug at a premium price.

Growth strategy

Amgen's growth plan has two parts: scale the newer medicines and buy what the pipeline does not supply. Recent launches and acquired products drove the 10% revenue growth in fiscal 2025, with Tezspire up 52% to US$1.48 billion, Repatha up 36% to US$3.02 billion, Evenity up 34% to US$2.10 billion, Uplizna up 73% to US$655 million and Imdelltra reaching US$627 million in its second year.

Competitive advantage

Amgen's main competitive advantage is experience making complex biologics at commercial scale, which it has done continuously since Epogen launched in 1989.

Amgen business model in full

Target

How it makes money

Target runs a general-merchandise, big-box retail model that pairs low-margin essentials (groceries, household basics) to drive store traffic with higher-margin discretionary categories (apparel, home decor, and private-label brands) to drive profit -- the classic 'basket size' strategy.

Growth strategy

Target is focusing on merchandising authority, guest experience, technology acceleration, team and community strength, stores-as-hubs, same-day fulfillment, retail media and owned-brand renewal.

Competitive advantage

Target's advantage is the mix of curated merchandise, owned brands, convenient stores, same-day fulfillment and a brand position between discount utility and design-led retail.

Target business model in full

Questions about Amgen vs Target

Which company has higher revenue — Amgen Inc. or Target Corporation?

Amgen Inc. reported $36.8B (FY2025), while Target Corporation reported $104.8B (FY2025). By last reported revenue, Target Corporation is the larger business, with Amgen Inc. reporting a smaller revenue base.

What is the market cap of Amgen Inc. vs Target Corporation?

Amgen Inc.'s market capitalisation stands at $228.2B, while Target Corporation's is $72.0B. Amgen Inc. carries the higher market valuation, reflecting investors' expectations of its future earnings power relative to Target Corporation.

Which is more financially efficient — Amgen Inc. or Target Corporation?

Amgen Inc. generates $1.17M / employee in revenue per employee, while Target Corporation generates $252k / employee. Amgen Inc. shows higher revenue efficiency per headcount, though this reflects business model differences — capital-light software companies routinely outperform labour-intensive manufacturers on this metric.

How do Amgen Inc. and Target Corporation make money?

Amgen Inc. and Target Corporation generate revenue in fundamentally different ways. Amgen Inc.: Amgen operates a high-risk, high-reward biopharmaceutical business model. Target Corporation: Target runs a general-merchandise, big-box retail model that pairs low-margin essentials (groceries, household basics) to drive store traffic with higher-margin discretionary categories (apparel, home decor, and private-label brands) to drive profit -- the classic 'basket size' strategy.

Which company is valued higher relative to revenue — Amgen Inc. or Target Corporation?

On a price-to-sales (P/S) basis, Amgen Inc. trades at 6.2x P/S and Target Corporation at 0.7x P/S. Amgen Inc. commands a higher revenue multiple, typically indicating that investors expect faster growth or higher future margins compared to Target Corporation. A higher multiple is not inherently better — it may also signal that the stock is priced for perfection.

Is Amgen Inc. bigger than Target Corporation?

By last reported revenue, Target Corporation ($104.8B (FY2025)) is the larger company compared to Amgen Inc. ($36.8B (FY2025)). Revenue scale is one dimension of size — market capitalisation, employee count, and geographic reach are also relevant depending on the context.

Figures come from each company's filings and the sources linked beside them. Amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Back to the Amgen vs Target overview

Content is for informational purposes only. Not financial advice. Data sourced from SEC filings, annual reports, and public records. See our full disclaimer and methodology.