Skip to main content

Amgen vs NEC: Revenue, Profit and Business Model

Amgen reported $36.8B of revenue in FY2025 and $7.7B of net income. NEC reported ~$24B of revenue in FY2026 and ~$1.8B of net income.

Latest financial snapshot

Amgen

Latest revenue
$36.8B (FY2025)
Net income
$7.7B
Net margin
21.0%
Revenue growth
+5.4% a year, FY2016–FY2025

NEC

Latest revenue
~$24B (FY2026)
Net income
~$1.8B
Net margin
7.5%
Revenue growth
+4.4% a year, FY2022–FY2026

Financial summary

Amgen

Amgen is a cash-generative business with high product gross margins. In fiscal 2025 it reported US$36.8 billion of total revenues, US$7.7 billion of GAAP net income, a 25.8% GAAP operating margin, US$8.1 billion of free cash flow and US$5.1 billion of dividends paid. Its results used to depend on a few large franchises, first Epogen and Aranesp, then Enbrel. As those matured Amgen bought revenue instead: Onyx in 2013, Otezla in 2019 and Horizon Therapeutics for US$27.8 billion in 2023. That last deal is also the main reason for the balance sheet it now carries, with US$54.6 billion of debt outstanding at December 31, 2025, debt leverage of about 3.2 times EBITDA and US$2.8 billion of net interest expense in fiscal 2025.

NEC

NEC's numbers show a company trading revenue for margin. Revenue moved from ~$20.2 billion (3,014.1 billion yen) in FY22/3 to ~$24 billion (3,582.7 billion yen) in FY26/3, but the bigger change was profitability: FY26/3 adjusted operating profit reached ~$2.59 billion (386.8 billion yen) (10.8% margin, up 2.4 points), net profit attributable to owners was ~$1.81 billion (270.2 billion yen), and non-GAAP net profit was ~$1.87 billion (279.8 billion yen), a record under IFRS. Momentum carried into FY27/3: first-quarter revenue rose 14.5% to ~$5.49 billion (819.8 billion yen), net profit was ~$333 million (49.7 billion yen), and NEC raised full-year guidance to ~$23.7 billion (3,540 billion yen) revenue and ~$2.88 billion (430 billion yen) adjusted operating profit.

Revenue and profit by year

Amgen

Amgen revenue, net income, margin and growth by fiscal year
YearRevenueNet incomeMarginGrowthSource
FY2025$36.8B$7.7B21.0%+10.0%Source
FY2024$33.4B$4.1B12.2%+18.6%Source
FY2023$28.2B$6.7B23.8%+7.1%Source
FY2022$26.3B$6.6B24.9%+1.3%Source
FY2021$26B$5.9B22.7%+2.2%Source
FY2020$25.4B$7.3B28.6%+8.8%Source
FY2019$23.4B$7.8B33.6%-1.6%Source
FY2018$23.7B$8.4B35.3%+3.9%Source
FY2017$22.8B$2B8.7%-0.6%Source
FY2016$23B$7.7B33.6%—Source
Full Amgen financials

NEC

NEC revenue, net income, margin and growth by fiscal year
YearRevenueNet incomeMarginGrowthSource
FY2026~$24B~$1.8B7.5%+4.7%Source
FY2025~$22.9B~$1.2B5.1%-1.5%Source
FY2024~$23.3B~$1B4.3%+5.0%Source
FY2023~$22.2B~$767.1M3.5%+9.9%Source
FY2022~$20.2B~$946.6M4.7%—Source
Full NEC financials

Where the revenue comes from

Amgen

  • U.S. product sales

    ~70% of total revenues

    United States product sales were US$25.66 billion in fiscal 2025, 73% of the US$35.15 billion product sales total and about 70% of total revenues. The largest domestic contributors were Prolia (US$2.98 billion), Enbrel (US$2.20 billion), Otezla (US$1.84 billion), Tepezza (US$1.76 billion), Repatha (US$1.66 billion), Evenity (US$1.60 billion) and Tezspire (US$1.48 billion). Access depends on formulary placement with the large pharmacy benefit managers and on Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement.

  • International product sales

    ~26% of total revenues

    Product sales outside the United States were US$9.49 billion in fiscal 2025, 27% of product sales. The largest were Repatha (US$1.35 billion), Aranesp (US$973 million), XGEVA (US$729 million), Vectibix (US$571 million) and Amgevita (US$549 million). Prices are generally lower than in the United States because of government reference pricing and national formulary negotiation.

  • Biosimilars

    ~8% of total revenues

    Biosimilars sit inside product sales and generated about US$3.0 billion in fiscal 2025: Mvasi (bevacizumab) US$771 million, Pavblu (aflibercept) US$700 million, Amjevita and Amgevita (adalimumab) US$597 million, Wezlana and Wezenla (ustekinumab) US$273 million, and US$683 million across the smaller biosimilars reported within other products. Amjevita sales fell 22% year over year, so segment growth now comes from the newer launches.

  • Rare disease portfolio acquired with Horizon

    ~13% of total revenues

    Also inside product sales, the medicines acquired with Horizon Therapeutics produced about US$4.6 billion in fiscal 2025: Tepezza US$1.90 billion, Krystexxa US$1.34 billion, Uplizna US$655 million and the ultra-rare products US$719 million. Uplizna grew 73% after approvals in IgG4-related disease and generalized myasthenia gravis, while the ultra-rare group fell 5% as Ravicti met generic competition.

  • Other revenues

    ~4% of total revenues

    Other revenues, mainly royalties, license income and corporate partner payments, were US$1.60 billion in fiscal 2025, the difference between US$36.75 billion of total revenues and US$35.15 billion of product sales. The line carries high margins but is not a growth priority.

NEC

  • IT Services70.0%

    FY26/3 revenue was ~$16.8 billion (2,508.9 billion yen), including Domestic IT and International digital government/digital finance work.

  • Social Infrastructure26.1%

    FY26/3 revenue was ~$6.27 billion (935.3 billion yen), including telecom services and aerospace/national security systems.

  • Others3.9%

    FY26/3 other revenue was ~$928 million (138.5 billion yen).

Business model and strategy

Amgen

How it makes money

Amgen operates a high-risk, high-reward biopharmaceutical business model. It spends heavily on research to discover and engineer new biologic drugs: US$7.3 billion in fiscal 2025, or 20.7% of product sales. Once a drug is approved by the FDA, Amgen secures a patent, granting them a temporary monopoly to sell the drug at a premium price.

Growth strategy

Amgen's growth plan has two parts: scale the newer medicines and buy what the pipeline does not supply. Recent launches and acquired products drove the 10% revenue growth in fiscal 2025, with Tezspire up 52% to US$1.48 billion, Repatha up 36% to US$3.02 billion, Evenity up 34% to US$2.10 billion, Uplizna up 73% to US$655 million and Imdelltra reaching US$627 million in its second year.

Competitive advantage

Amgen's main competitive advantage is experience making complex biologics at commercial scale, which it has done continuously since Epogen launched in 1989.

Amgen business model in full

NEC

How it makes money

NEC makes money by selling technology projects and recurring services to governments, enterprises and telecom carriers. In FY26/3 (year ended March 31, 2026), IT Services produced ~$16.8 billion (2,508.9 billion yen), about 70% of revenue: system integration, managed services and the BluStellar DX offering in Japan, plus digital government and digital finance software abroad through subsidiaries such as Avaloq, KMD a…

Growth strategy

Under its 2025 Mid-term Management Plan, which NEC says it achieved in FY26/3, the company prioritized digital government and digital finance, 5G, and core DX (now branded BluStellar) as growth businesses while monitoring and pruning low-profit work.

Competitive advantage

NEC's edge comes from decades of trusted delivery to Japanese ministries, municipalities, the Ministry of Defense and NTT-group carriers, which makes it hard to displace on security-sensitive systems. Its face and fingerprint algorithms have repeatedly placed at or near the top of US NIST benchmark tests, which supports border-control and airport contracts abroad.

NEC business model in full

Questions about Amgen vs NEC

Which company has higher revenue — Amgen Inc. or NEC Corporation?

Amgen Inc. reported $36.8B (FY2025), while NEC Corporation reported ~$24B (FY2026). By last reported revenue, Amgen Inc. is the larger business, with NEC Corporation reporting a smaller revenue base. Note: these are from different fiscal years and are not a direct like-for-like comparison.

What is the market cap of Amgen Inc. vs NEC Corporation?

Amgen Inc.'s market capitalisation stands at $228.2B, while NEC Corporation's is $40.2B. Amgen Inc. carries the higher market valuation, reflecting investors' expectations of its future earnings power relative to NEC Corporation.

Which is more financially efficient — Amgen Inc. or NEC Corporation?

Amgen Inc. generates $1.17M / employee in revenue per employee, while NEC Corporation generates $236k / employee. Amgen Inc. shows higher revenue efficiency per headcount, though this reflects business model differences — capital-light software companies routinely outperform labour-intensive manufacturers on this metric.

How do Amgen Inc. and NEC Corporation make money?

Amgen Inc. and NEC Corporation generate revenue in fundamentally different ways. Amgen Inc.: Amgen operates a high-risk, high-reward biopharmaceutical business model. NEC Corporation: NEC makes money by selling technology projects and recurring services to governments, enterprises and telecom carriers.

Which company is valued higher relative to revenue — Amgen Inc. or NEC Corporation?

On a price-to-sales (P/S) basis, Amgen Inc. trades at 6.2x P/S and NEC Corporation at 1.7x P/S. Amgen Inc. commands a higher revenue multiple, typically indicating that investors expect faster growth or higher future margins compared to NEC Corporation. A higher multiple is not inherently better — it may also signal that the stock is priced for perfection.

Is Amgen Inc. bigger than NEC Corporation?

By last reported revenue, Amgen Inc. ($36.8B (FY2025)) is the larger company compared to NEC Corporation (~$24B (FY2026)). Revenue scale is one dimension of size — market capitalisation, employee count, and geographic reach are also relevant depending on the context.

Figures come from each company's filings and the sources linked beside them. Amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Back to the Amgen vs NEC overview

Content is for informational purposes only. Not financial advice. Data sourced from SEC filings, annual reports, and public records. See our full disclaimer and methodology.