AMD vs Marvell: Revenue, Profit and Business Model
AMD had $34.6B of annual revenue in FY2025 and $4.3B of net income. Marvell had $8.2B of annual revenue in FY2026 and $2.7B of net income.
Latest financial snapshot
Financial summary
AMD
AMD's decade is a turnaround with a paper trail. Revenue fell to $4.0B in 2015 and the company lost $660M; its market value ended that year near $2.3B. Zen-based Ryzen and EPYC parts, and Intel's process delays, shifted the mix toward servers and then AI accelerators. FY2025 revenue was $34.6B, up 34% from $25.8B, with net income of $4.3B, a 50% gross margin, $8.1B of research and development spending, and $4.1B of marketing, general and administrative expense. Cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments rose to $10.6B from $5.1B a year earlier, against $3.3B of total debt principal. The result also absorbed about $440M of net inventory and related charges tied to US export controls on Instinct MI308 products. AMD experienced exponential growth, reaching a market valuation of over $250 billion as it captured significant market share in CPUs and data center accelerators.
Marvell
Marvell's revenue was $2.70 billion in fiscal 2020 and $5.77 billion in fiscal 2025, then jumped 42% to $8.195 billion in fiscal 2026 as AI data-center demand ramped. GAAP results were losses from fiscal 2021 through fiscal 2025, mainly due to amortization from the Inphi and Cavium deals and restructuring charges. Fiscal 2026 GAAP net income was $2.67 billion, helped by a pre-tax gain of about $1.8 billion on the $2.5 billion sale of the automotive Ethernet unit to Infineon. In Q2 fiscal 2027 (quarter ended August 1, 2026) revenue was $2.739 billion, GAAP net income $308.0 million ($0.33 per share), non-GAAP EPS $0.94 and operating cash flow $605.5 million. Marvell guided Q3 fiscal 2027 revenue to $3.15 billion, plus or minus 5%. Marvell Technology, Inc. is a major American fabless semiconductor company heavily focused on data center infrastructure, commanding a market valuation typically exceeding $65 billion.
Revenue and profit by year
AMD
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Growth | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $34.6B | $4.3B | 12.5% | +34.3% | Source |
| FY2024 | $25.8B | $1.6B | 6.4% | +13.7% | Source |
| FY2023 | $22.7B | $854M | 3.8% | -3.9% | Source |
| FY2022 | $23.6B | $1.3B | 5.6% | +43.6% | Source |
| FY2021 | $16.4B | $3.2B | 19.2% | +68.3% | Source |
| FY2020 | $9.8B | $2.5B | 25.5% | +45.0% | Source |
| FY2019 | $6.7B | $341M | 5.1% | +4.0% | Source |
| FY2018 | $6.5B | $337M | 5.2% | +23.3% | Source |
| FY2017 | $5.3B | -$33M | -0.6% | +21.6% | Source |
| FY2016 | $4.3B | -$498M | -11.5% | — | Source |
Marvell
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Growth | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2026 | $8.2B | $2.7B | 32.6% | +42.1% | Source |
| FY2025 | $5.8B | -$885M | -15.3% | +4.7% | Source |
| FY2024 | $5.5B | -$933.4M | -16.9% | -7.0% | Source |
| FY2023 | $5.9B | -$163.5M | -2.8% | +32.7% | Source |
| FY2022 | $4.5B | -$421M | -9.4% | +50.3% | Source |
| FY2021 | $3B | -$277.3M | -9.3% | +10.0% | Source |
| FY2020 | $2.7B | $1.6B | 58.7% | — | Source |
Where the revenue comes from
AMD
- Data Center~48%
EPYC server CPUs, Instinct AI accelerators, Pensando DPUs, AI network interface cards, FPGAs, and adaptive SoCs sold to cloud providers, enterprises, and HPC customers. Net revenue was $16.6B in FY2025, up 32%.
- Client and Gaming~42%
Ryzen desktop and notebook processors, chipsets, Radeon discrete GPUs, and semi-custom SoCs for PlayStation and Xbox consoles. Net revenue was $14.6B in FY2025, up 51%, with Client at $10.6B and Gaming at $3.9B.
- Embedded~10%
Xilinx-derived FPGAs, adaptive SoCs, system-on-modules, and embedded CPUs sold into telecommunications, aerospace, defense, automotive, and industrial markets. Net revenue was $3.5B in FY2025, down 3%.
Marvell
- Data Center
74% of FY2026 revenue
Generated $6.1003 billion in fiscal 2026 revenue from custom silicon, networking, optical connectivity, storage, and data-center infrastructure products.
- Communications and Other
26% of FY2026 revenue
Generated $2.0943 billion in fiscal 2026 revenue from carrier, enterprise, automotive legacy, and other communications-related products.
- Direct Customers
57% of FY2026 revenue
Direct customer sales accounted for $4.6304 billion of fiscal 2026 revenue.
- Distributors
43% of FY2026 revenue
Distributor sales accounted for $3.5642 billion of fiscal 2026 revenue.
Business model and strategy
AMD
How it makes money
Advanced Micro Devices runs a fabless semiconductor model. It designs CPUs, GPUs, AI accelerators, FPGAs, and adaptive SoCs, and contracts the wafer manufacturing to outside foundries, primarily TSMC. That structure keeps leading-edge fabrication off AMD's balance sheet and makes engineering its largest investment: research and development cost $8.1B in FY2025, about 23% of revenue.
Growth strategy
AMD's growth plan centers on data center AI, funded by $8.1B of research and development in FY2025. It has bought capability rather than waiting to build it: Xilinx in February 2022 for FPGAs and adaptive computing, a deal announced in October 2020 at about $35B in stock and worth roughly $49B at close; Pensando in May 2022 for DPUs at about $1.9B; Silo AI in August 2024 for AI software engineering at about $665M;
Competitive advantage
AMD's advantage is design and packaging execution without fab ownership. Because it buys capacity from TSMC instead of running leading-edge fabs, it can move to a newer process node as soon as the foundry has one in volume. Its chiplet approach assembles a processor from smaller dies linked by Infinity Fabric, which improves usable yield and makes high core-count parts cheaper to build than a single large die.
Marvell
How it makes money
Marvell runs a fabless model: it designs chips and licenses-in or builds IP (SerDes, PAM4 and coherent DSPs, Arm compute subsystems, packaging), while foundries such as TSMC manufacture them. It makes money in two ways. First, it sells standard products, including electro-optics DSPs and drivers for optical modules, Teralynx Ethernet switches, PCIe/CXL retimers, storage controllers and OCTEON processors.
Growth strategy
Marvell's growth plan centers on AI infrastructure. It is expanding custom XPU and XPU-attach programs with large cloud providers, upgrading optical DSPs from 800G to 1.6T and beyond, growing Teralynx switches and retimers, and adding optical scale-up interconnect through Celestial AI.
Competitive advantage
Marvell's edge is breadth of data-center IP. It combines high-speed SerDes, PAM4 and coherent optical DSPs (largely from the 2021 Inphi deal), Ethernet switching, custom ASIC design services and, since 2026, Celestial AI's photonic interconnect technology. That lets it sell several components into the same AI cluster and offer hyperscalers a full custom-chip design and packaging service on advanced TSMC nodes.
Questions about AMD vs Marvell
Which company has higher revenue — Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. or Marvell Technology, Inc.?
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. had $34.6B (FY2025), while Marvell Technology, Inc. had $8.2B (FY2026). By latest annual revenue, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. is the larger business, with Marvell Technology, Inc. showing a smaller revenue base. Note: these are from different fiscal years and are not a direct like-for-like comparison.
What is the market cap of Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. vs Marvell Technology, Inc.?
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.'s market capitalisation stands at $999.5B, while Marvell Technology, Inc.'s is $225.7B. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. carries the higher market valuation, reflecting investors' expectations of its future earnings power relative to Marvell Technology, Inc..
How does revenue per employee compare for Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and Marvell Technology, Inc.?
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. has $1.12M / employee in revenue per employee, while Marvell Technology, Inc. has $1.11M / employee. Headcounts may use different dates, so the ratio alone does not establish which business operates more efficiently.
How do Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and Marvell Technology, Inc. make money?
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and Marvell Technology, Inc. generate revenue in fundamentally different ways. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.: Advanced Micro Devices runs a fabless semiconductor model. Marvell Technology, Inc.: Marvell runs a fabless model: it designs chips and licenses-in or builds IP (SerDes, PAM4 and coherent DSPs, Arm compute subsystems, packaging), while foundries such as TSMC manufacture them.
Which company is valued higher relative to revenue — Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. or Marvell Technology, Inc.?
On a price-to-sales (P/S) basis, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. trades at 28.9x P/S and Marvell Technology, Inc. at 27.5x P/S. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. commands a higher revenue multiple, typically indicating that investors expect faster growth or higher future margins compared to Marvell Technology, Inc.. A higher multiple is not inherently better — it may also signal that the stock is priced for perfection.
Is Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. bigger than Marvell Technology, Inc.?
By last reported revenue, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. ($34.6B (FY2025)) is the larger company compared to Marvell Technology, Inc. ($8.2B (FY2026)). Revenue scale is one dimension of size — market capitalisation, employee count, and geographic reach are also relevant depending on the context.
Figures come from each company's filings and the sources linked beside them. Amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Back to the AMD vs Marvell overview