AMD vs Bristol-Myers Squibb: Revenue, Profit and Business Model
AMD reported $34.6B of revenue in FY2025 and $4.3B of net income. Bristol-Myers Squibb reported $48.2B of revenue in FY2025 and $7.1B of net income.
Latest financial snapshot
AMD
- Latest revenue
- $34.6B (FY2025)
- Net income
- $4.3B
- Net margin
- 12.5%
- Revenue growth
- +26.0% a year, FY2016–FY2025
Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Latest revenue
- $48.2B (FY2025)
- Net income
- $7.1B
- Net margin
- 14.6%
- Revenue growth
- +10.6% a year, FY2016–FY2025
Financial summary
AMD
AMD's decade is a turnaround with a paper trail. Revenue fell to $4.0B in 2015 and the company lost $660M; its market value ended that year near $2.3B. Zen-based Ryzen and EPYC parts, and Intel's process delays, shifted the mix toward servers and then AI accelerators. FY2025 revenue was $34.6B, up 34% from $25.8B, with net income of $4.3B, a 50% gross margin, $8.1B of research and development spending, and $4.1B of marketing, general and administrative expense. Cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments rose to $10.6B from $5.1B a year earlier, against $3.3B of total debt principal. The result also absorbed about $440M of net inventory and related charges tied to US export controls on Instinct MI308 products.
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Revenue grew from $19.4 billion in 2016 to $42.5 billion in 2020 as Celgene's sales were added, and has stayed between $45.0 billion and $48.3 billion since 2021. Net earnings are far less stable because BMS expenses acquired in-process R&D: the $11.4 billion MyoKardia charge produced a $9.0 billion net loss in 2020, and the Karuna charge produced an $8.9 billion loss in 2024. Cash generation is steadier, with free cash flow of about $12.8 billion in 2025. That cash funds a dividend raised for a 17th straight year in February 2026, to $0.63 a quarter, and debt reduction, from $51.2 billion at the end of 2024 to $47.2 billion a year later. On July 30, 2026 BMS raised its 2026 revenue guidance to $49.0 to $50.0 billion, from $46.0 to $47.5 billion, after second-quarter revenue rose 6 percent to $12.97 billion.
Revenue and profit by year
AMD
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Growth | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $34.6B | $4.3B | 12.5% | +34.3% | Source |
| FY2024 | $25.8B | $1.6B | 6.4% | +13.7% | Source |
| FY2023 | $22.7B | $854M | 3.8% | -3.9% | Source |
| FY2022 | $23.6B | $1.3B | 5.6% | +43.6% | Source |
| FY2021 | $16.4B | $3.2B | 19.2% | +68.3% | Source |
| FY2020 | $9.8B | $2.5B | 25.5% | +45.0% | Source |
| FY2019 | $6.7B | $341M | 5.1% | +4.0% | Source |
| FY2018 | $6.5B | $337M | 5.2% | +23.3% | Source |
| FY2017 | $5.3B | -$33M | -0.6% | +21.6% | Source |
| FY2016 | $4.3B | -$498M | -11.5% | — | Source |
Bristol-Myers Squibb
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Growth | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $48.2B | $7.1B | 14.6% | -0.2% | Source |
| FY2024 | $48.3B | -$8.9B | -18.5% | +7.3% | Source |
| FY2023 | $45B | $8B | 17.8% | -2.5% | Source |
| FY2022 | $46.2B | $6.3B | 13.7% | -0.5% | Source |
| FY2021 | $46.4B | $7B | 15.1% | +9.1% | Source |
| FY2020 | $42.5B | -$9B | -21.2% | +62.6% | Source |
| FY2019 | $26.1B | $3.4B | 13.2% | +15.9% | Source |
| FY2018 | $22.6B | $4.9B | 21.8% | +8.6% | Source |
| FY2017 | $20.8B | $1B | 4.8% | +6.9% | Source |
| FY2016 | $19.4B | $4.5B | 22.9% | — | Source |
Where the revenue comes from
AMD
- Data Center~48%
EPYC server CPUs, Instinct AI accelerators, Pensando DPUs, AI network interface cards, FPGAs, and adaptive SoCs sold to cloud providers, enterprises, and HPC customers. Net revenue was $16.6B in FY2025, up 32%.
- Client and Gaming~42%
Ryzen desktop and notebook processors, chipsets, Radeon discrete GPUs, and semi-custom SoCs for PlayStation and Xbox consoles. Net revenue was $14.6B in FY2025, up 51%, with Client at $10.6B and Gaming at $3.9B.
- Embedded~10%
Xilinx-derived FPGAs, adaptive SoCs, system-on-modules, and embedded CPUs sold into telecommunications, aerospace, defense, automotive, and industrial markets. Net revenue was $3.5B in FY2025, down 3%.
Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Growth Portfolio~55%
$26.4 billion in 2025, up 17%: Opdivo, Opdivo Qvantig, Orencia, Yervoy, Reblozyl, Breyanzi, Opdualag, Camzyos, Sotyktu, Cobenfy, Krazati and other newer brands. It grew another 15% to $7.56 billion in the second quarter of 2026.
- Legacy Portfolio~45%
$21.8 billion in 2025: Eliquis ($14.4 billion), Revlimid ($3.0 billion), Pomalyst/Imnovid ($2.7 billion), Sprycel, Abraxane and other mature brands facing generic competition. Legacy revenue fell 4% in the second quarter of 2026.
Business model and strategy
AMD
How it makes money
Advanced Micro Devices runs a fabless semiconductor model. It designs CPUs, GPUs, AI accelerators, FPGAs, and adaptive SoCs, and contracts the wafer manufacturing to outside foundries, primarily TSMC. That structure keeps leading-edge fabrication off AMD's balance sheet and makes engineering its largest investment: research and development cost $8.1B in FY2025, about 23% of revenue.
Growth strategy
AMD's growth plan centers on data center AI, funded by $8.1B of research and development in FY2025. It has bought capability rather than waiting to build it: Xilinx in February 2022 for FPGAs and adaptive computing, a deal announced in October 2020 at about $35B in stock and worth roughly $49B at close; Pensando in May 2022 for DPUs at about $1.9B; Silo AI in August 2024 for AI software engineering at about $665M;
Competitive advantage
AMD's advantage is design and packaging execution without fab ownership. Because it buys capacity from TSMC instead of running leading-edge fabs, it can move to a newer process node as soon as the foundry has one in volume. Its chiplet approach assembles a processor from smaller dies linked by Infinity Fabric, which improves usable yield and makes high core-count parts cheaper to build than a single large die.
Bristol-Myers Squibb
How it makes money
BMS discovers, licenses or buys drug candidates, takes them through clinical trials, and sells approved medicines under patent protection to wholesalers, specialty pharmacies and hospitals. Net product sales were $46.8 billion of the $48.2 billion total in 2025; alliance, royalty and other revenues made up the remaining $1.4 billion, including royalties from Merck on Winrevair.
Growth strategy
BMS is pursuing growth on three fronts. First, scaling the Growth Portfolio (Opdivo Qvantig, Reblozyl, Camzyos, Breyanzi, Opdualag, Cobenfy and others), which rose 17 percent to $26.4 billion in 2025 and 15 percent to $7.56 billion in the second quarter of 2026.
Competitive advantage
BMS's advantage is its expertise in oncology and its large commercial and regulatory organization. Developing a cancer immunotherapy is complex, and winning approval from regulators and getting doctors to prescribe it requires an established global sales and regulatory team.
Questions about AMD vs Bristol-Myers Squibb
Which company has higher revenue — Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. or Bristol-Myers Squibb Company?
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. reported $34.6B (FY2025), while Bristol-Myers Squibb Company reported $48.2B (FY2025). By last reported revenue, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company is the larger business, with Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. reporting a smaller revenue base.
What is the market cap of Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. vs Bristol-Myers Squibb Company?
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.'s market capitalisation stands at $999.5B, while Bristol-Myers Squibb Company's is $127.5B. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. carries the higher market valuation, reflecting investors' expectations of its future earnings power relative to Bristol-Myers Squibb Company.
Which is more financially efficient — Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. or Bristol-Myers Squibb Company?
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. generates $1.12M / employee in revenue per employee, while Bristol-Myers Squibb Company generates $1.48M / employee. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company shows higher revenue efficiency per headcount, though this reflects business model differences — capital-light software companies routinely outperform labour-intensive manufacturers on this metric.
How do Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company make money?
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company generate revenue in fundamentally different ways. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.: Advanced Micro Devices runs a fabless semiconductor model. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: BMS discovers, licenses or buys drug candidates, takes them through clinical trials, and sells approved medicines under patent protection to wholesalers, specialty pharmacies and hospitals.
Which company is valued higher relative to revenue — Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. or Bristol-Myers Squibb Company?
On a price-to-sales (P/S) basis, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. trades at 28.9x P/S and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company at 2.6x P/S. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. commands a higher revenue multiple, typically indicating that investors expect faster growth or higher future margins compared to Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. A higher multiple is not inherently better — it may also signal that the stock is priced for perfection.
Is Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. bigger than Bristol-Myers Squibb Company?
By last reported revenue, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company ($48.2B (FY2025)) is the larger company compared to Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. ($34.6B (FY2025)). Revenue scale is one dimension of size — market capitalisation, employee count, and geographic reach are also relevant depending on the context.
Figures come from each company's filings and the sources linked beside them. Amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Back to the AMD vs Bristol-Myers Squibb overview