Skip to main content

Restaurant Brands International Inc. vs Yum! Brands, Inc.: Strategic Comparison

Direct Answer

Restaurant Brands International Inc. had $9.4B (FY2025), while Yum! Brands, Inc. had $8.2B (FY2025). Revenue describes scale, not an overall winner.

Editorial research by Swet Parvadiya. Figures keep each company's fiscal year; amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Sources are listed below.

Share

Key Differences at a Glance

FieldRestaurant Brands International Inc.Yum! Brands, Inc.
Latest annual revenue$9.4B (FY2025)$8.2B (FY2025)
Founded20141997
EmployeesN/A36,000
Market Cap$35.0B$42.0B
HeadquartersCanadaUnited States
Revenue / EmployeeN/A$228k / employee
Valuation Multiple3.7x P/S5.1x P/S

Strategic Positioning

Business model and competitive context from the cited profiles

Restaurant Brands International Inc. Strategic Vector

FY2025 Revenue Baseline

RBI's results depend less on reported revenue, which swings with how many restaurants it owns at a given time, and more on system-wide sales and franchisee returns. The Q2 2026 rebound at Burger King U.S. matters because healthier franchisees are what fund remodels and new units.

Yum! Brands, Inc. Strategic Vector

FY2025 Revenue Baseline

Selling Pizza Hut removed the brand with the weakest U.S. trend (U.S. comparable sales had declined for ten straight quarters, according to Reuters) and left Yum more exposed to Taco Bell, which made the July 2026 food safety disruption more visible in group results.

Productivity: $228k / employee

Restaurant Brands International Inc. vs Yum! Brands, Inc. Market Share

Restaurant Brands International Inc. market share
RBI is one of the largest quick-service restaurant companies globally, with more than $45 billion in system-wide sales and 33,041 restaurants at year-end 2025. Tim Hortons is the largest coffee and quick-service chain in Canada, while Burger King ranks behind McDonald's in U.S. burgers.

Quick Stats Comparison

MetricRestaurant Brands International Inc.Yum! Brands, Inc.
Revenue$9.4B (FY2025)$8.2B (FY2025)
Founded20141997
HeadquartersToronto, Ontario, CanadaLouisville, Kentucky, United States
Market Cap$35.0B$42.0B
Employees—36,000
Revenue / EmployeeN/A$228k / employee
Valuation Multiple3.7x P/S5.1x P/S

Restaurant Brands International Inc. Revenue vs Yum! Brands, Inc. Revenue — Year by Year

YearRestaurant Brands International Inc.Yum! Brands, Inc.Higher reported revenue
2025$9.4B$8.2BRestaurant Brands International Inc. (approx. USD)
2024$8.4B$7.5BRestaurant Brands International Inc. (approx. USD)
2023$7.0B$7.1BYum! Brands, Inc. (approx. USD)
2022$6.5B$6.8BYum! Brands, Inc. (approx. USD)
2021$5.7B$6.6BYum! Brands, Inc. (approx. USD)

Business Model Breakdown

Overview: Restaurant Brands International Inc. vs Yum! Brands, Inc.

This in-depth comparison examines Restaurant Brands International Inc. and Yum! Brands, Inc. across revenue, market value, business model, competitive positioning, and long-term growth strategy. Whether you are researching Restaurant Brands International Inc. on its own, evaluating Yum! Brands, Inc., or weighing the two companies side by side, the breakdown below highlights where each company leads and where the gap between Restaurant Brands International Inc. and Yum! Brands, Inc. is widest.

On the headline numbers, annual revenue is $9.4B (FY2025) for Restaurant Brands International Inc. and $8.2B (FY2025) for Yum! Brands, Inc., while their respective market capitalizations stand at $35.0B and $42.0B. Restaurant Brands International Inc. is headquartered in Canada and Yum! Brands, Inc. in United States, and those different home markets shape how each company competes.

Restaurant Brands International Inc.: Restaurant Brands International is one of the world's largest quick-service restaurant companies, with more than $45 billion in annual system-wide sales. It is a holding company for Tim Hortons, Burger King, Popeyes and Firehouse Subs, and it operates mostly as a franchisor rather than a restaurant operator. Its corporate headquarters is in Toronto, while much of the leadership team works from Miami. 3G Capital, which assembled the company, remains a significant shareholder. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada. Restaurant Brands International was formed in 2014 in Oakville, Ontario, Canada, through the landmark $12.5 billion merger of Burger King and Tim Hortons engineered by 3G Capital and Berkshire Hathaway, creating one of the world’s largest quick-service restaurant empires.

Yum! Brands, Inc.: Yum! Brands is a Louisville-based restaurant franchisor that owns KFC, Taco Bell, and Habit Burger & Grill. After selling Pizza Hut in 2026, its results depend mainly on KFC's international unit growth and Taco Bell's U.S. sales. The company is headquartered in Louisville, Kentucky.

Business Models: How Restaurant Brands International Inc. and Yum! Brands, Inc. Make Money

Restaurant Brands International Inc. and Yum! Brands, Inc. pursue distinct approaches to generating revenue, and understanding how each company operates is the foundation of any fair comparison between Restaurant Brands International Inc. and Yum! Brands, Inc..

Restaurant Brands International Inc. business model: RBI makes most of its profit by franchising. Franchisees build and run the vast majority of its 33,000+ restaurants (over 90% of system restaurants are franchised) and pay RBI royalties and advertising contributions based on their sales. RBI also earns property revenue where it leases restaurants to franchisees, supply chain revenue from Tim Hortons' Canadian distribution and manufacturing business, and restaurant sales from company-operated units, a line that grew after the 2024 Carrols acquisition. Internationally, RBI usually signs master franchise or joint-venture partners who fund development across a whole country.

Yum! Brands, Inc. business model: Most Yum restaurants are owned and run by franchisees. Yum collects franchise and license fees (royalties tied to sales, plus upfront fees on new units), franchise contributions to advertising funds, rental income on some properties it subleases, and sales from a smaller set of company-operated restaurants, including most Habit locations. Because franchisees fund most store construction and employ most restaurant workers, Yum's own capital needs and headcount are small relative to system sales. Yum China, a separate listed company since the 2016 spin-off, operates KFC in mainland China under a license and pays Yum a royalty on sales. With Pizza Hut sold in 2026, the reporting portfolio now centers on the KFC and Taco Bell divisions plus Habit.

Competitive Advantage: Restaurant Brands International Inc. vs Yum! Brands, Inc.

The durability of a company's moat often decides long-term winners. Here is how the competitive advantages of Restaurant Brands International Inc. stack up against those of Yum! Brands, Inc..

Restaurant Brands International Inc. competitive advantage: RBI's advantage is brand scale plus a capital-light structure. Four established brands give it multiple growth paths across burgers, coffee, chicken and subs, while master franchise partners fund most international openings. Tim Hortons' dense Canadian network and its integrated supply chain also give RBI a cash-generating home market that few rivals can replicate.

Yum! Brands, Inc. competitive advantage: KFC's development system opens restaurants at a pace few chains match, with 660 gross openings across 55 markets in the second quarter of 2026. Taco Bell holds a leading position in U.S. Mexican-style quick service. The franchise model keeps capital spending low and turns system growth into royalty income.

Growth Strategy: Where Restaurant Brands International Inc. and Yum! Brands, Inc. Are Headed

Future prospects matter as much as current results. The growth strategies below explain how Restaurant Brands International Inc. and Yum! Brands, Inc. each plan to expand from here.

Restaurant Brands International Inc. growth strategy: RBI's growth plan has three parts: lift Burger King U.S. sales through remodels, advertising and operations under the Reclaim the Flame program; refranchise the restaurants acquired with Carrols once they are remodeled; and accelerate International unit growth through master franchisees and joint ventures, including the CPE-led Burger King China venture that targets more than 4,000 restaurants by 2035. Tim Hortons Canada and Popeyes remain key contributors.

Yum! Brands, Inc. growth strategy: Under Chris Turner, Yum is concentrating on KFC unit growth in emerging and developed international markets, Taco Bell growth in the U.S. and abroad, and its Byte by Yum digital platform for ordering, kitchen, and delivery management. The 2026 portfolio review ended with the Pizza Hut sale.

Financial Picture: Restaurant Brands International Inc. vs Yum! Brands, Inc.

A closer look at the financial trajectory of Restaurant Brands International Inc. and Yum! Brands, Inc. rounds out the comparison.

Restaurant Brands International Inc.: RBI reported FY2025 total revenues of $9.434 billion, up 12.2% from $8.406 billion in 2024, largely because the Carrols restaurants and Burger King China were consolidated for more of the year. Net income from continuing operations was $1.201 billion and total net income was $1.075 billion after a $126 million loss from discontinued operations. Adjusted operating income rose to $2.584 billion, and RBI returned about $1.1 billion to shareholders. In Q2 2026 revenue rose 4.5% to about $2.52 billion, system-wide sales grew 6.4% and comparable sales grew 3.8%. Restaurant Brands International (RBI) is a colossal Canadian-American multinational fast food holding company, commanding a massive market valuation generally exceeding $30 billion.

Yum! Brands, Inc.: Fiscal 2025 total revenues were $8.214 billion, up 9%, with GAAP net income of $1.559 billion and GAAP EPS of $5.55 (EPS excluding Special Items of $6.05, up 10%). Fourth-quarter 2025 revenue was $2.514 billion. In the second quarter of 2026 revenue rose about 12% to $2.169 billion, GAAP EPS was $3.08 and EPS excluding Special Items was $1.62. Pizza Hut sale proceeds of about $2.7 billion arrived in the third quarter of 2026, subject to purchase price adjustments.

Company-Specific SWOT Notes

Restaurant Brands International Inc.

Strength

Tim Hortons, Burger King, Popeyes, and Firehouse Subs diversify categories, geographies, and unit-growth paths.

Strength

RBI owns almost absolutely zero physical restaurants; by relying entirely on independent franchisees to absorb all capital costs and labor risks, it generates incredibly reliable, high-margin royalty streams.

Weakness

If franchisee margins weaken, remodels and new restaurant development slow down.

Weakness

3G Capital's notorious, hyper-aggressive 'zero-based budgeting' severely alienated thousands of Tim Hortons franchisees, leading to massive lawsuits and a severe deterioration in food quality.

Opportunity

Master franchisees and the Burger King China JV can add restaurants with less corporate capital than wholly owned expansion.

Threat

McDonald's massive, multi-billion dollar investments in digital drive-thrus, mobile apps, and loyalty programs severely outpace Burger King's technological capabilities, constantly stealing market share.

Yum! Brands, Inc.

Strength

Franchisees fund most store openings, so system growth turns into royalty income with limited capital from Yum.

Strength

KFC posted 660 gross openings across 55 markets in the second quarter of 2026.

Weakness

Without Pizza Hut, Taco Bell's U.S. results carry more weight, as the July 2026 food safety disruption showed.

Opportunity

About $2.7 billion of sale proceeds gives Yum room for reinvestment, debt reduction, or shareholder returns.

Threat

Discounting by rivals and higher food and labor costs can squeeze franchisee profits and slow openings.

Factual Scorecard

CategoryResultWhy
Same-period Revenue ScaleRestaurant Brands International Inc.$9.4B (FY2025) versus $8.2B (FY2025); the higher figure is identified after approximate USD conversion.
Founded EarlierYum! Brands, Inc.Restaurant Brands International Inc. was founded in 2014; Yum! Brands, Inc. was founded in 1997.
Verdict

Comparison Takeaway: Restaurant Brands International Inc. vs Yum! Brands, Inc.

Restaurant Brands International Inc. had $9.4B (FY2025), while Yum! Brands, Inc. had $8.2B (FY2025). Revenue describes scale, not an overall winner. Compare the same reporting period and the metric relevant to the question—revenue, profitability, growth, product fit, or market value—rather than treating them as one composite score.

Methodology and sourcing reviewed by Swet Parvadiya. No date is shown unless this comparison has its own editorial review date.

Frequently Asked Questions: Restaurant Brands International Inc. vs Yum! Brands, Inc.

Which company was founded first, Restaurant Brands International Inc. or Yum! Brands, Inc.?

Yum! Brands, Inc. was founded in 1997; Restaurant Brands International Inc. was founded in 2014.

What revenue did Restaurant Brands International Inc. and Yum! Brands, Inc. report?

Restaurant Brands International Inc. had $9.4B (FY2025), while Yum! Brands, Inc. had $8.2B (FY2025). These figures describe revenue scale; they do not by themselves determine an overall winner.

How do Restaurant Brands International Inc. and Yum! Brands, Inc. make money?

Restaurant Brands International Inc.: RBI makes most of its profit by franchising. Yum! Brands, Inc.: Most Yum restaurants are owned and run by franchisees.

Which is better, Restaurant Brands International Inc. or Yum! Brands, Inc.?

There is no evidence-based single winner. Compare Restaurant Brands International Inc. and Yum! Brands, Inc. on the same fiscal period and the metric relevant to the question, such as revenue, profitability, growth, product fit, or market value.

Sources & References

Cite This Page

Automatically generated citations for researchers.

APA Format

CorpDigest. (2026). Restaurant Brands International Inc. vs Yum! Brands, Inc. Comparison. from https://corpdigest.com/compare/restaurant-brands-vs-yum-brands

MLA Format

CorpDigest. "Restaurant Brands International Inc. vs Yum! Brands, Inc. Comparison." CorpDigest, 2026, https://corpdigest.com/compare/restaurant-brands-vs-yum-brands.

Chicago Format

CorpDigest. "Restaurant Brands International Inc. vs Yum! Brands, Inc. Comparison." CorpDigest. 2026. https://corpdigest.com/compare/restaurant-brands-vs-yum-brands.

Content is for informational purposes only. Not financial advice. Data sourced from SEC filings, annual reports, and public records. See our full disclaimer and methodology.