Skip to main content

Groq, Inc. vs Texas Instruments Inc.: Strategic Comparison

Direct Answer

Groq, Inc. had $172.5M (unaudited) (FY2025), while Texas Instruments Inc. had $17.7B (FY2025). Revenue describes scale, not an overall winner.

Editorial research by Swet Parvadiya. Figures keep each company's fiscal year; amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Sources are listed below.

Share

Key Differences at a Glance

FieldGroq, Inc.Texas Instruments Inc.
Latest annual revenue$172.5M (unaudited) (FY2025)$17.7B (FY2025)
Founded20161951
EmployeesN/A33,000
Market CapN/A$236.0B
HeadquartersUnited StatesUnited States
Revenue / EmployeeN/A$536k / employee
Valuation MultipleN/A13.3x P/S

Strategic Positioning

Business model and competitive context from the cited profiles

Groq, Inc. Strategic Vector

FY2025 Revenue Baseline

Since the Nvidia deal, Groq's strategy is to grow GroqCloud as a neocloud: add data center capacity across regions, sell dedicated and sovereign capacity to large customers, and run a mix of its own LPUs and Nvidia systems.

Texas Instruments Inc. Strategic Vector

FY2025 Revenue Baseline

TI accepted several years of depressed free cash flow to build 300mm capacity ahead of demand. Trailing free cash flow of $6.5 billion in mid-2026, versus $1.8 billion a year earlier, is the first clear sign that the trade-off is working.

Productivity: $536k / employee

Groq, Inc. vs Texas Instruments Inc. Market Share

Groq, Inc. market share
Groq does not disclose market share. By mid-2026 it reported 13 data centers and more than five million developers on GroqCloud.
Texas Instruments Inc. market share
Texas Instruments is widely regarded as the largest analog chipmaker by revenue, ahead of Analog Devices, with a broad position in microcontrollers and processors for industrial and automotive uses.

Quick Stats Comparison

MetricGroq, Inc.Texas Instruments Inc.
Revenue$172.5M (unaudited) (FY2025)$17.7B (FY2025)
Founded20161951
HeadquartersMountain View, California, United StatesDallas, Texas, United States
Market CapN/A$236.0B
Employees—33,000
Revenue / EmployeeN/A$536k / employee
Valuation MultipleN/A13.3x P/S

Groq, Inc. Revenue vs Texas Instruments Inc. Revenue — Year by Year

YearGroq, Inc.Texas Instruments Inc.Higher reported revenue
2025$172.5M (unaudited)$17.7BTexas Instruments Inc. (approx. USD)
2024$90.0M (unaudited)$15.6BTexas Instruments Inc. (approx. USD)
2023$14.0M (unaudited)$17.5BTexas Instruments Inc. (approx. USD)
2022N/A$20.0BOnly one figure available
2021N/A$18.3BOnly one figure available

Business Model Breakdown

Overview: Groq, Inc. vs Texas Instruments Inc.

This in-depth comparison examines Groq, Inc. and Texas Instruments Inc. across revenue, market value, business model, competitive positioning, and long-term growth strategy. Whether you are researching Groq, Inc. on its own, evaluating Texas Instruments Inc., or weighing the two companies side by side, the breakdown below highlights where each company leads and where the gap between Groq, Inc. and Texas Instruments Inc. is widest.

On the headline numbers, annual revenue is $172.5M (unaudited) (FY2025) for Groq, Inc. and $17.7B (FY2025) for Texas Instruments Inc., while their respective market capitalizations stand at N/A and $236.0B. Both Groq, Inc. and Texas Instruments Inc. are headquartered in United States. Their local markets and applicable rules may still differ.

Groq, Inc.: Groq started as a chip company trying to beat GPUs at inference and became, by 2026, primarily an AI inference cloud. Its LPU put model weights in on-chip SRAM and let a compiler plan every step, which made GroqCloud fast enough to go viral in early 2024. That speed drew Nvidia, which in December 2025 licensed the technology for about $20 billion and hired founder Jonathan Ross, now Nvidia's chief software architect. The independent Groq that remains runs 13 data centers and serves millions of developers. The company is headquartered in Mountain View, California.

Texas Instruments Inc.: Texas Instruments reported FY2025 revenue of $17.682 billion and net income of $5.001 billion, with about 33,000 employees. In Q2 2026 revenue rose 23% to $5.463 billion. Haviv Ilan is chairman, president and CEO, and the company's market value was roughly $236 billion in September 2026. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

Business Models: How Groq, Inc. and Texas Instruments Inc. Make Money

Groq, Inc. and Texas Instruments Inc. pursue distinct approaches to generating revenue, and understanding how each company operates is the foundation of any fair comparison between Groq, Inc. and Texas Instruments Inc..

Groq, Inc. business model: Groq makes money by selling AI inference. Most customers pay per million tokens to run open-weight models (such as Llama, Qwen, Kimi and Whisper) through GroqCloud, an OpenAI-compatible API with a free tier and paid developer and enterprise plans. Larger customers buy dedicated capacity or on-premises GroqRack clusters. In December 2025 Groq also received a one-time licensing payment from Nvidia, reported at about $20 billion, much of which was reported to flow to investors and departing staff. Since that deal Groq describes itself as a neocloud and has become an Nvidia Cloud Partner, so its data centers can host Nvidia hardware as well as LPUs. Groq does not publish revenue.

Texas Instruments Inc. business model: Texas Instruments operates an integrated semiconductor design and manufacturing model, specializing in high-margin analog chips and embedded processing solutions. The company manufactures tens of thousands of differentiated products sold to over 100,000 global customers across the industrial, automotive, personal electronics, communications, and enterprise systems sectors. Revenue is anchored by Analog Semiconductor Products (operational amplifiers, data converters, power management integrated circuits), which convert real-world signals into digital data, and Embedded Processing Hardware (microcontrollers, digital signal processors). Operating its own high-efficiency 300mm wafer fabrication facilities, TI maintains substantial structural cost advantages, low capital intensity per chip, long product lifecycles, and exceptional free cash flow margins.

Competitive Advantage: Groq, Inc. vs Texas Instruments Inc.

The durability of a company's moat often decides long-term winners. Here is how the competitive advantages of Groq, Inc. stack up against those of Texas Instruments Inc..

Groq, Inc. competitive advantage: Groq's edge was speed. Because the LPU keeps model weights in on-chip SRAM and its compiler schedules every operation ahead of time, GroqCloud consistently ranked among the fastest providers in independent token-per-second benchmarks. After the Nvidia deal, its advantages are an installed base of 13 inference data centers, a developer community of more than five million, existing LPU fleets, and the freedom to combine LPUs with Nvidia systems as an Nvidia Cloud Partner.

Texas Instruments Inc. competitive advantage: TI's edge rests on owned, mostly 300mm analog manufacturing, a very broad catalog of long-lived parts, direct reach to customers through ti.com, and a cost structure that let it generate $6.5 billion of free cash flow in the 12 months to June 2026.

Growth Strategy: Where Groq, Inc. and Texas Instruments Inc. Are Headed

Future prospects matter as much as current results. The growth strategies below explain how Groq, Inc. and Texas Instruments Inc. each plan to expand from here.

Groq, Inc. growth strategy: Since the Nvidia deal, Groq's strategy is to grow GroqCloud as a neocloud: add data center capacity across regions, sell dedicated and sovereign capacity to large customers, and run a mix of its own LPUs and Nvidia systems. It rebuilt its leadership in 2026 with COO Alan Rice (ex-xAI and Meta), CTO Sinclair Schuller and CPO Rakesh Malhotra (both co-founders of Nuvalence), and funded the expansion with a $650 million raise in June 2026.

Texas Instruments Inc. growth strategy: TI's strategy has four parts. First, manufacturing: it has spent heavily on 300mm analog fabs in Richardson (RFAB2), Lehi, Utah (LFAB, bought from Micron in 2021 for $900 million) and Sherman, Texas, where SM1 began production in December 2025, with support from the U.S. CHIPS Act. Second, market focus on industrial and automotive customers, which account for most of revenue, plus fast-growing data center power demand. Third, a broad catalog and long product lives, so design wins keep paying for years. Fourth, channel control through ti.com and direct relationships. In 2026 TI added a rare large acquisition, agreeing to buy Silicon Labs for $231 per share (about $7.5 billion) to expand in wireless connectivity for industrial and IoT devices.

Financial Picture: Groq, Inc. vs Texas Instruments Inc.

A closer look at the financial trajectory of Groq, Inc. and Texas Instruments Inc. rounds out the comparison.

Groq, Inc.: Groq is private and does not report revenue or profit. What is public is its funding: a $300 million Series C in 2021, a $640 million Series D in August 2024 at a $2.8 billion valuation led by BlackRock, a $750 million round in September 2025 at a $6.9 billion post-money valuation led by Disruptive, and a $650 million round in June 2026 led by Disruptive and Infinitum at an undisclosed valuation. Separately, Nvidia's December 2025 non-exclusive license was reported at about $20 billion, Nvidia's largest deal to date. Revenue figures circulating online are estimates, not company disclosures.

Texas Instruments Inc.: TI's revenue fell from a $20.03 billion peak in 2022 to $15.64 billion in 2024 during an industry inventory correction, then recovered to $17.68 billion in 2025 with net income of $5.00 billion. The upturn accelerated in 2026: Q2 revenue reached $5.46 billion, operating profit rose 48% to $2.31 billion and net income rose 53% to $1.98 billion. With heavy fab spending past its peak, trailing 12-month free cash flow climbed to $6.5 billion from $1.8 billion a year earlier. TI guided Q3 2026 revenue to $5.65-$6.15 billion.

Company-Specific SWOT Notes

Groq, Inc.

Strength

GroqCloud has consistently ranked among the fastest providers in public tokens-per-second benchmarks.

Strength

13 data centers and more than five million developers by mid-2026.

Weakness

Nvidia's non-exclusive license lets the market leader sell Groq-derived LPX systems.

Weakness

The founder, president and an interim CEO all left within about four months, requiring a rebuilt executive team.

Opportunity

Inference spending is rising as AI apps and agents scale, and Groq plans to quadruple capacity in 2027.

Threat

Many clouds serve the same open models, pushing prices down.

Texas Instruments Inc.

Strength

TI's 300-millimeter manufacturing and broad analog catalog support cost advantages and long product lives.

Strength

TI holds massive global market share in analog semiconductors, which are required by the thousands in EVs and industrial machinery, providing extremely stable, long-tail revenue.

Weakness

A large industrial customer base creates cyclicality when customers destock or delay orders.

Weakness

Because analog chips do not require cutting-edge manufacturing nodes, TI faces intense pricing pressure from heavily subsidized domestic Chinese foundries.

Opportunity

Factory automation, electrification, embedded control, and power management can expand demand.

Threat

Large fab investments can pressure cash flow if demand lags capacity additions.

Factual Scorecard

CategoryResultWhy
Same-period Revenue ScaleTexas Instruments Inc.$172.5M (unaudited) (FY2025) versus $17.7B (FY2025); the higher figure is identified after approximate USD conversion.
Founded EarlierTexas Instruments Inc.Groq, Inc. was founded in 2016; Texas Instruments Inc. was founded in 1951.
Verdict

Comparison Takeaway: Groq, Inc. vs Texas Instruments Inc.

Groq, Inc. had $172.5M (unaudited) (FY2025), while Texas Instruments Inc. had $17.7B (FY2025). Revenue describes scale, not an overall winner. Compare the same reporting period and the metric relevant to the question—revenue, profitability, growth, product fit, or market value—rather than treating them as one composite score.

Methodology and sourcing reviewed by Swet Parvadiya. No date is shown unless this comparison has its own editorial review date.

Frequently Asked Questions: Groq, Inc. vs Texas Instruments Inc.

Which company was founded first, Groq, Inc. or Texas Instruments Inc.?

Texas Instruments Inc. was founded in 1951; Groq, Inc. was founded in 2016.

What revenue did Groq, Inc. and Texas Instruments Inc. report?

Groq, Inc. had $172.5M (unaudited) (FY2025), while Texas Instruments Inc. had $17.7B (FY2025). These figures describe revenue scale; they do not by themselves determine an overall winner.

How do Groq, Inc. and Texas Instruments Inc. make money?

Groq, Inc.: Groq makes money by selling AI inference. Texas Instruments Inc.: Texas Instruments operates an integrated semiconductor design and manufacturing model, specializing in high-margin analog chips and embedded processing solutions.

Which is better, Groq, Inc. or Texas Instruments Inc.?

There is no evidence-based single winner. Compare Groq, Inc. and Texas Instruments Inc. on the same fiscal period and the metric relevant to the question, such as revenue, profitability, growth, product fit, or market value.

Sources & References

Cite This Page

Automatically generated citations for researchers.

APA Format

CorpDigest. (2026). Groq, Inc. vs Texas Instruments Inc. Comparison. from https://corpdigest.com/compare/groq-vs-texas-instruments

MLA Format

CorpDigest. "Groq, Inc. vs Texas Instruments Inc. Comparison." CorpDigest, 2026, https://corpdigest.com/compare/groq-vs-texas-instruments.

Chicago Format

CorpDigest. "Groq, Inc. vs Texas Instruments Inc. Comparison." CorpDigest. 2026. https://corpdigest.com/compare/groq-vs-texas-instruments.

Content is for informational purposes only. Not financial advice. Data sourced from SEC filings, annual reports, and public records. See our full disclaimer and methodology.