Eli Lilly and Company vs Novo Nordisk A/S: Strategic Comparison
Direct Answer
Eli Lilly is bigger by both revenue and market value: it reported $65.179 billion of 2025 revenue against Novo Nordisk's DKK 309.064 billion (about $46.0 billion), and was worth roughly $1.06 trillion in late September 2026, versus Novo's roughly $170 billion. Lilly also leads where it matters most commercially, holding 60.9% of the US obesity and diabetes drug market in the second quarter of 2026 to Novo's 38.8%, according to Lilly's August 2026 earnings presentation. Novo remains larger by headcount, with about 66,700 employees to Lilly's roughly 50,000.
Eli Lilly's roughly $1.06 trillion market value is now about six times Novo Nordisk's roughly $170 billion, a gap that barely existed in mid-2024 when Novo was briefly Europe's most valuable company. Lilly, founded in Indianapolis in 1876 by Colonel Eli Lilly, is run by Chair and CEO David A. Ricks, who has held the role since January 2017. Novo Nordisk, formed in 1989 from the merger of two Danish insulin pioneers founded in 1923 and 1925, is led by Maziar "Mike" Doustdar, who became CEO on August 7, 2025. Lilly reported $65.179 billion of 2025 revenue and $20.640 billion of net income, versus Novo's DKK 309.064 billion (about $46.0 billion) of 2025 net sales and ~$15.6 billion (DKK 102.434 billion) of net profit. Lilly employed about 50,000 people at the end of 2025, while Novo employed about 66,700 after a 2025 restructuring that targeted roughly 9,000 job cuts.
Editorial research by Swet Parvadiya. Figures keep each company's fiscal year; amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Sources are listed below.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Field | Eli Lilly and Company | Novo Nordisk A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Latest annual revenue | $65.2B (FY2025) | ~$47B (FY2025) |
| Founded | 1876 | 1989 |
| Employees | 50,000 | 66,700 |
| Market Cap | $1.06T | $170.0B |
| Headquarters | United States | Denmark |
| Revenue / Employee | $1.30M / employee | $704k / employee |
| Valuation Multiple | 16.3x P/S | 3.6x P/S |
Strategic Positioning
Business model and competitive context from the cited profiles
Eli Lilly and Company Strategic Vector
FY2025 Revenue BaselineLilly's bet is that whoever controls incretin manufacturing capacity and offers both injectable and pill options will lead obesity care. Foundayo's 2026 approval gives Lilly a scalable small-molecule product alongside tirzepatide, reducing dependence on peptide production lines.
Novo Nordisk A/S Strategic Vector
FY2025 Revenue BaselineNovo's 2025 sales of ~$47B (DKK 309B) prove semaglutide demand, but the 2026 guidance of 0% to -6% adjusted growth shows that volume gains are being offset by lower US prices. Whether the Wegovy pill and cash-pay channels can grow profit, not just prescriptions, is the key question.
Quick Stats Comparison
| Metric | Eli Lilly and Company | Novo Nordisk A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $65.2B (FY2025) | ~$47B (FY2025) |
| Founded | 1876 | 1989 |
| Headquarters | Indianapolis, Indiana | Bagsvaerd, Denmark |
| Market Cap | $1.06T | $170.0B |
| Employees | 50,000 | 66,700 |
| Revenue / Employee | $1.30M / employee | $704k / employee |
| Valuation Multiple | 16.3x P/S | 3.6x P/S |
Eli Lilly and Company Revenue vs Novo Nordisk A/S Revenue — Year by Year
| Year | Eli Lilly and Company | Novo Nordisk A/S | Higher reported revenue |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $65.2B | ~$47B | Eli Lilly and Company (approx. USD) |
| 2024 | $45.0B | ~$44.1B | Eli Lilly and Company (approx. USD) |
| 2023 | $34.1B | ~$35.3B | Novo Nordisk A/S (approx. USD) |
| 2022 | $28.5B | ~$26.9B | Eli Lilly and Company (approx. USD) |
| 2021 | $28.3B | ~$21.4B | Eli Lilly and Company (approx. USD) |
Business Model Breakdown
Overview: Eli Lilly and Company vs Novo Nordisk A/S
This in-depth comparison examines Eli Lilly and Company and Novo Nordisk A/S across revenue, market value, business model, competitive positioning, and long-term growth strategy. Whether you are researching Eli Lilly and Company on its own, evaluating Novo Nordisk A/S, or weighing the two companies side by side, the breakdown below highlights where each company leads and where the gap between Eli Lilly and Company and Novo Nordisk A/S is widest.
On the headline numbers, annual revenue is $65.2B (FY2025) for Eli Lilly and Company and ~$47B (FY2025) for Novo Nordisk A/S, while their respective market capitalizations stand at $1.06T and $170.0B. Eli Lilly and Company is headquartered in United States and Novo Nordisk A/S in Denmark, and those different home markets shape how each company competes.
Eli Lilly and Company: Eli Lilly is a 150-year-old Indianapolis pharmaceutical company that has become the world's largest drugmaker by market value. For most of its history it was best known for insulin and Prozac. Since 2022, tirzepatide, a dual GIP/GLP-1 agonist sold as Mounjaro for type 2 diabetes and Zepbound for obesity, has transformed its scale, taking revenue from $28.5 billion in 2022 to $65.2 billion in 2025 and a guided $85-87 billion in 2026. The company is headquartered in Indianapolis, Indiana.
Novo Nordisk A/S: Novo Nordisk is a Danish drugmaker headquartered in Bagsvaerd near Copenhagen. Its products include a large share of the world's insulin, plus semaglutide, the molecule behind Ozempic, Wegovy and Rybelsus. Semaglutide made Novo Europe's most valuable company in 2023-2024. The shares have since fallen more than 70% from their peak as Eli Lilly gained share, and the company replaced its CEO and most of its board in 2025. The company is headquartered in Bagsværd, Denmark.
Business Models: How Eli Lilly and Company and Novo Nordisk A/S Make Money
Eli Lilly and Company and Novo Nordisk A/S pursue distinct approaches to generating revenue, and understanding how each company operates is the foundation of any fair comparison between Eli Lilly and Company and Novo Nordisk A/S.
Eli Lilly and Company business model: Lilly makes money by discovering, developing, manufacturing and selling patent-protected prescription medicines. Revenue comes mainly from product sales to wholesalers, pharmacies and health systems, with net prices set through negotiations with insurers, pharmacy benefit managers and governments; collaboration and royalty income adds a smaller share. Cardiometabolic medicines dominate: Mounjaro ($22.97 billion) and Zepbound ($13.54 billion) together produced about 56% of 2025 revenue. Lilly also sells directly to self-pay patients through LillyDirect, including Zepbound vials and Foundayo tablets, which reduces reliance on traditional pharmacy benefit channels for obesity care.
Novo Nordisk A/S business model: Novo Nordisk sells prescription medicines through two segments. Diabetes and Obesity care is the bulk of sales: GLP-1 drugs (Ozempic, Rybelsus, Wegovy injection, the Wegovy pill launched in the US in January 2026 and Wegovy HD 7.2 mg), plus insulins such as Tresiba and NovoRapid. Rare disease covers haemophilia, growth hormone and other endocrine products. In the US, revenue depends on list prices, rebates to pharmacy benefit managers and government programmes such as 340B and Medicare, and increasingly on self-pay channels where patients buy Wegovy directly at lower prices. The US is the largest market; International Operations covers the rest of the world.
Competitive Advantage: Eli Lilly and Company vs Novo Nordisk A/S
The durability of a company's moat often decides long-term winners. Here is how the competitive advantages of Eli Lilly and Company stack up against those of Novo Nordisk A/S.
Eli Lilly and Company competitive advantage: Lilly's advantage combines a century of diabetes and peptide-hormone expertise with manufacturing scale few rivals can match. Tirzepatide's dual GIP/GLP-1 mechanism produced greater weight loss than semaglutide in the head-to-head SURMOUNT-5 trial, and Foundayo gives Lilly a small-molecule GLP-1 pill that can be taken without food or water restrictions and is easier to mass-produce than peptides. Heavy investment in U.S. and European plants lets Lilly supply volume growth that competitors struggle to match.
Novo Nordisk A/S competitive advantage: Novo Nordisk's edge is a century of peptide and insulin manufacturing know-how, large owned API and fill-finish capacity (including three former Catalent sites bought for $11B in 2024), outcomes data such as SELECT (20% lower risk of major cardiovascular events) and FLOW, and the first approved oral GLP-1 for obesity. Foundation control also lets it invest for the long term without takeover risk.
Growth Strategy: Where Eli Lilly and Company and Novo Nordisk A/S Are Headed
Future prospects matter as much as current results. The growth strategies below explain how Eli Lilly and Company and Novo Nordisk A/S each plan to expand from here.
Eli Lilly and Company growth strategy: Lilly's growth strategy has three parts: expand incretin supply and indications, add oral and next-generation obesity medicines, and diversify through oncology, immunology, neuroscience and genetic medicine. Foundayo (orforglipron) was approved by the FDA on April 1, 2026 and launched through LillyDirect, telehealth and U.S. retail pharmacies. Retatrutide, a GIP/GLP-1/glucagon triple agonist, is in Phase 3. Lilly continues to build U.S. and European manufacturing capacity and uses acquisitions to add pipeline assets.
Novo Nordisk A/S growth strategy: Under CEO Mike Doustdar the strategy is to cut costs (about 9,000 roles targeted in 2025, with reported headcount down further since), push volume through cheaper self-pay and oral options such as the Wegovy pill, roll out Wegovy 7.2 mg internationally, and rebuild the pipeline through deals such as the Akero Therapeutics acquisition for MASH and in-licensing agreements.
Financial Picture: Eli Lilly and Company vs Novo Nordisk A/S
A closer look at the financial trajectory of Eli Lilly and Company and Novo Nordisk A/S rounds out the comparison.
Eli Lilly and Company: Revenue rose from $28.5 billion in 2022 to $45.0 billion in 2024 and $65.2 billion in 2025, while net income nearly doubled to $20.6 billion. Growth accelerated again in 2026: second-quarter revenue rose 48% to $23.0 billion, with Mounjaro at $9.94 billion (up 91%) and Zepbound at $4.93 billion. Lilly raised 2026 revenue guidance to $85-87 billion and non-GAAP EPS guidance to $35.50-36.50. Capital expenditures reached $7.8 billion in 2025 as Lilly expanded production capacity. Eli Lilly and Company is a pharmaceutical titan that has experienced massive growth, commanding a monumental market valuation frequently exceeding $700 billion.
Novo Nordisk A/S: Sales grew from ~$18.5B (DKK 122.0B) in 2019 to ~$47B (DKK 309.1B) in 2025, and net profit rose from ~$5.93B (DKK 39.0B) to ~$15.6B (DKK 102.4B), driven by Ozempic and Wegovy. Growth slowed to 6.4% in reported DKK in 2025 as US prices fell and competition rose. In H1 2026 reported sales were ~$26.6B (DKK 175.3B), inflated by a one-off 340B rebate provision reversal; adjusted sales were ~$22.6B (DKK 148.6B). Q2 2026 adjusted sales rose 7% at constant exchange rates, and management guided full-year 2026 adjusted sales and operating profit growth of 0% to -6% at CER.
Company-Specific SWOT Notes
Eli Lilly and Company
Lilly's tirzepatide franchise represents one of the most commercially successful pharmaceutical launches in history, with combined Mounjaro and Zepbound revenues of $36.5 billion in fiscal year 2025 and significant additional indication expansion in developmen
With more than 50 active molecules in clinical development and $13.3 billion invested in R&D in fiscal year 2025, Lilly's pipeline represents one of the most productive in the pharmaceutical industry.
Despite a multi-billion-dollar manufacturing expansion program, Lilly's production capacity for tirzepatide and other injectable biologics has lagged the notable demand generated by commercial launches, resulting in drug shortages that have frustrated patients
Tirzepatide, sold as Mounjaro and Zepbound, produced about 56% of Lilly's 2025 revenue and roughly 65% of Q2 2026 revenue.
The FDA approved Foundayo (orforglipron) on April 1, 2026, making it the first small-molecule GLP-1 pill for weight loss that can be taken at any time of day without food or water restrictions.
The Inflation Reduction Act's Medicare drug price negotiation program, which allows the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to directly negotiate prices for high-expenditure drugs, represents a structural threat to Lilly's revenue model in the United St
Novo Nordisk A/S
Ozempic, Wegovy and Rybelsus carry heart, kidney and obesity outcomes data, and the Wegovy pill gives Novo the first approved oral GLP-1 for obesity.
Novo Nordisk possesses an absolutely staggering, near-monopoly first-mover advantage in highly effective GLP-1 weight-loss drugs (Wegovy), generating unprecedented, historic levels of cash flow.
CagriSema results, the ZEUS ziltivekimab failure and a ~$608M (DKK 4.0B) monlunabant impairment in 2026 leave Novo dependent on one molecule.
The global demand for Ozempic and Wegovy is so insanely high that Novo Nordisk absolutely cannot manufacture the injector pens fast enough, leading to massive, multi-year supply shortages.
The Wegovy pill, Wegovy 7.2 mg roll-out and under-penetrated obesity markets outside the US can lift volumes.
Tirzepatide share gains, oral orforglipron, US price cuts and semaglutide patent expiries in markets such as China and Canada from 2026 pressure growth.
Factual Scorecard
| Category | Result | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Same-period Revenue Scale | Eli Lilly and Company | $65.2B (FY2025) versus ~$47B (FY2025); the higher figure is identified after approximate USD conversion. |
| Founded Earlier | Eli Lilly and Company | Eli Lilly and Company was founded in 1876; Novo Nordisk A/S was founded in 1989. |
Comparison Takeaway: Eli Lilly and Company vs Novo Nordisk A/S
Methodology and sourcing reviewed by Swet Parvadiya. No date is shown unless this comparison has its own editorial review date.
Frequently Asked Questions: Eli Lilly and Company vs Novo Nordisk A/S
Is Eli Lilly bigger than Novo Nordisk?
Yes, on every major financial measure in 2025-2026. Lilly reported $65.179 billion of 2025 revenue versus Novo Nordisk's DKK 309.064 billion (about $46.0 billion), and Lilly's roughly $1.06 trillion market value in late September 2026 was about six times Novo's roughly $170 billion. Novo still has more employees, about 66,700 versus Lilly's 50,000.
Which is more profitable, Eli Lilly or Novo Nordisk?
Novo Nordisk has the slightly higher margin: its ~$15.6 billion (DKK 102.434 billion) of 2025 net profit was 33.1% of sales, versus Lilly's 31.7% net margin on $20.640 billion of 2025 net income. But Lilly's profit is growing much faster, nearly doubling in 2025, while Novo guided 2026 adjusted operating profit to range from flat to down 6% at constant exchange rates.
Who is the CEO of Eli Lilly compared with Novo Nordisk's CEO?
David A. Ricks has been Eli Lilly's Chair and CEO since January 2017. Novo Nordisk's CEO is Maziar 'Mike' Doustdar, who took over on August 7, 2025, succeeding Lars Fruergaard Jorgensen and becoming the first non-Danish chief executive in Novo's history.
Why did Novo Nordisk sue Eli Lilly?
Novo Nordisk sued Eli Lilly on July 21, 2026 in US District Court in New Jersey, accusing Lilly of false advertising and unfair competition in television and digital ad campaigns for Zepbound and Mounjaro. The suit came as Lilly's tirzepatide drugs overtook Novo's semaglutide drugs in US obesity and diabetes market share, 60.9% to 38.8% in the second quarter of 2026.
Which is the better GLP-1 stock, Eli Lilly or Novo Nordisk?
Eli Lilly has been the stronger stock through 2026: its shares rose roughly 13-40% over the trailing year while it crossed a $1 trillion market value on November 21, 2025, whereas Novo Nordisk shares fell as much as 70% from their 2024 peak after guiding to possibly flat-to-declining 2026 sales. Novo trades far cheaper, at about 11.8 times forward earnings versus Lilly's roughly 24.4 times, which is why some investors still see it as the value pick despite Lilly's stronger growth.
Which company was founded first, Eli Lilly and Company or Novo Nordisk A/S?
Eli Lilly and Company was founded in 1876; Novo Nordisk A/S was founded in 1989.
What revenue did Eli Lilly and Company and Novo Nordisk A/S report?
Eli Lilly and Company had $65.2B (FY2025), while Novo Nordisk A/S had ~$47B (FY2025). These figures describe revenue scale; they do not by themselves determine an overall winner.
How do Eli Lilly and Company and Novo Nordisk A/S make money?
Eli Lilly and Company: Lilly makes money by discovering, developing, manufacturing and selling patent-protected prescription medicines. Novo Nordisk A/S: Novo Nordisk sells prescription medicines through two segments.
Which is better, Eli Lilly and Company or Novo Nordisk A/S?
There is no evidence-based single winner. Compare Eli Lilly and Company and Novo Nordisk A/S on the same fiscal period and the metric relevant to the question, such as revenue, profitability, growth, product fit, or market value.
Sources & References
- SEC EDGAR: Eli Lilly and Company filings search (10-K, 8-K)
- Eli Lilly and Company Corporate Website
- Eli Lilly and Company 2025 revenue figure: sec.gov
- data.sec.gov
- investor.lilly.com
- en.wikipedia.org
- finance.yahoo.com
- stockanalysis.com
- investor.lilly.com
- cnbc.com
- investor.lilly.com
- investor.lilly.com
- Novo Nordisk A/S Corporate Website
- Novo Nordisk A/S 2025 revenue figure: NOVO NORDISK A/S annual report (Form 20-F, SEC EDGAR, filed 2026-02-04)
- sec.gov
- novonordisk.com
- en.wikipedia.org
- novonordisk.com
- global.morningstar.com
- sec.gov
Quick Answer
Eli Lilly is bigger by both revenue and market value: it reported $65.179 billion of 2025 revenue against Novo Nordisk's DKK 309.064 billion (about $46.0 billion), and was worth roughly $1.06 trillion in late September 2026, versus Novo's roughly $170 billion. Lilly also leads where it matters most commercially, holding 60.9% of the US obesity and diabetes drug market in the second quarter of 2026 to Novo's 38.8%, according to Lilly's August 2026 earnings presentation. Novo remains larger by headcount, with about 66,700 employees to Lilly's roughly 50,000.
Verdict
The two companies are now headed in opposite directions. Lilly's revenue grew 44.7% in 2025 to $65.179 billion, driven by Mounjaro ($22.965 billion, up 99%) and Zepbound ($13.542 billion, up 175%), while Novo's 2025 sales grew just 6.4% and management has guided 2026 adjusted sales to range from flat to down 6% at constant exchange rates. Lilly's net margin was 31.7% in 2025 versus Novo's 33.1%, so Novo still converts a slightly larger share of each sales dollar to profit, but Lilly's absolute profit nearly doubled to $20.640 billion in 2025 while Novo's grew far more slowly. Lilly is betting on manufacturing scale and an all-small-molecule obesity pill, Foundayo (orforglipron), approved by the FDA on April 1, 2026, while Novo is defending its lead in oral GLP-1 drugs with the Wegovy pill, which launched in the US in January 2026, months ahead of Foundayo. On valuation, Lilly trades at about 24.4 times forward earnings against Novo's roughly 11.8 times, reflecting Wall Street's bet that Lilly's growth continues while Novo resets around slower, mid-single-digit targets through 2030.
Cite This Page
Automatically generated citations for researchers.
CorpDigest. (2026). Eli Lilly and Company vs Novo Nordisk A/S Comparison. from https://corpdigest.com/compare/eli-lilly-vs-novo-nordisk
CorpDigest. "Eli Lilly and Company vs Novo Nordisk A/S Comparison." CorpDigest, 2026, https://corpdigest.com/compare/eli-lilly-vs-novo-nordisk.
CorpDigest. "Eli Lilly and Company vs Novo Nordisk A/S Comparison." CorpDigest. 2026. https://corpdigest.com/compare/eli-lilly-vs-novo-nordisk.