Skip to main content

Databricks, Inc. vs Snowflake Inc.: Strategic Comparison

Direct Answer

Databricks is larger by growth and by self-reported run-rate: it says revenue run-rate topped $7 billion in the quarter ended July 31, 2026, growing more than 80% year over year, versus Snowflake's audited $4.684 billion in revenue for fiscal 2026 (ended January 31, 2026), up 29%. Databricks is also valued higher despite being private — $190 billion as of August 13, 2026, against Snowflake's roughly $118 billion public market capitalization in late September 2026. Snowflake is the more transparent of the two: it files GAAP financials with the SEC and reported a $1.332 billion net loss for fiscal 2026, while Databricks does not disclose audited net income, saying only that it has generated positive adjusted free cash flow over the trailing twelve months.

Databricks, still a private company, was valued at $190 billion after an August 13, 2026 funding round led by Coatue — about 1.6 times Snowflake's roughly $118 billion public market capitalization in late September 2026, even though Snowflake is the one that actually trades on the NYSE and files audited results. Snowflake, founded in 2012 by Benoit Dageville, Thierry Cruanes and Marcin Żukowski, reported $4.684 billion of revenue for fiscal 2026 (ended January 31, 2026) and a GAAP net loss of $1.332 billion, with Sridhar Ramaswamy as CEO since February 2024. Databricks, founded a year later in 2013 by the UC Berkeley researchers who built Apache Spark, has never filed public financial statements but says its revenue run-rate passed $7 billion in the quarter ended July 31, 2026, growing more than 80% year over year, under co-founder and CEO Ali Ghodsi. Snowflake employed about 9,060 people as of January 31, 2026, while Databricks is estimated at roughly 14,000.

Editorial research by Swet Parvadiya. Figures keep each company's fiscal year; amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Sources are listed below.

Share

Key Differences at a Glance

FieldDatabricks, Inc.Snowflake Inc.
Latest annual revenue$2.6B (FY2025)$4.7B (FY2026)
Founded20132012
Employees14,0009,060
Market CapN/A$118.0B
HeadquartersUnited StatesUnited States
Revenue / Employee$186k / employee$517k / employee
Valuation MultipleN/A25.2x P/S

Strategic Positioning

Business model and competitive context from the cited profiles

Databricks, Inc. Strategic Vector

FY2025 Revenue Baseline

Databricks is expanding from analytics into the systems that enterprise AI agents run on.

Productivity: $186k / employee

Snowflake Inc. Strategic Vector

FY2026 Revenue Baseline

Under CEO Sridhar Ramaswamy, Snowflake is positioning itself as the data layer for enterprise AI agents.

Productivity: $517k / employee
Comparative Divergence: Snowflake and Databricks both started as single-purpose tools — Snowflake a SQL data warehouse, Databricks a managed version of Apache Spark for data engineering — but by 2026 each is building SQL warehousing, machine learning, and AI agent infrastructure on the other's turf, with Databricks' Lakehouse SQL product and Snowflake's Cortex AI as the clearest examples. Snowflake's May 27, 2026 agreement to spend $6 billion on AWS infrastructure over five years, paired with its planned acquisition of Natoma for Model Context Protocol governance, is aimed at owning the control plane for enterprise AI agents before Databricks' Unity AI Gateway and Lakebase do the same. Databricks answered by closing a $5 billion round at a $190 billion valuation on August 13, 2026, just six months after its $134 billion February 2026 round, explicitly to fund Lakebase, Genie, and the Unity AI Gateway. Both companies are converging on Apache Iceberg-compatible open table formats, which lowers the switching cost between them and shifts the next phase of the rivalry toward AI agent tooling rather than storage-format lock-in.

Databricks, Inc. vs Snowflake Inc. Market Share

Databricks, Inc. market share
Databricks does not publish a market share figure, and no audited share estimate for the lakehouse category exists. By scale, it is one of the two largest independent cloud data platforms alongside Snowflake: more than 20,000 organizations, about 70% of the Fortune 500, and a revenue run-rate above $7 billion as of August 2026.
Snowflake Inc. market share
Snowflake Inc. is one of the premier market leaders in Cloud Data Warehousing and Data Cloud, commanding substantial market share and strong brand equity across its core geographic operating regions.

Quick Stats Comparison

MetricDatabricks, Inc.Snowflake Inc.
Revenue$2.6B (FY2025)$4.7B (FY2026)
Founded20132012
HeadquartersSan Francisco, California, United StatesBozeman, Montana
Market CapN/A$118.0B
Employees14,0009,060
Revenue / Employee$186k / employee$517k / employee
Valuation MultipleN/A25.2x P/S

Databricks, Inc. Revenue vs Snowflake Inc. Revenue — Year by Year

YearDatabricks, Inc.Snowflake Inc.Higher reported revenue
2026N/A$4.7BOnly one figure available
2025$2.6B$3.6BSnowflake Inc. (approx. USD)
2024$1.6B$2.8BSnowflake Inc. (approx. USD)
2023N/A$2.1BOnly one figure available
2022N/A$1.2BOnly one figure available

Business Model Breakdown

Overview: Databricks, Inc. vs Snowflake Inc.

This in-depth comparison examines Databricks, Inc. and Snowflake Inc. across revenue, market value, business model, competitive positioning, and long-term growth strategy. Whether you are researching Databricks, Inc. on its own, evaluating Snowflake Inc., or weighing the two companies side by side, the breakdown below highlights where each company leads and where the gap between Databricks, Inc. and Snowflake Inc. is widest.

On the headline numbers, annual revenue is $2.6B (FY2025) for Databricks, Inc. and $4.7B (FY2026) for Snowflake Inc., while their respective market capitalizations stand at N/A and $118.0B. Both Databricks, Inc. and Snowflake Inc. are headquartered in United States. Their local markets and applicable rules may still differ.

Databricks, Inc.: Databricks sells a cloud platform where companies store, govern, and analyze their data, then build machine learning models and AI agents on top of it. Based in San Francisco, it grew out of UC Berkeley's AMPLab and the Apache Spark project and later coined the 'lakehouse' idea of running warehouse-style analytics directly on low-cost cloud object storage. Customers such as adidas, AT&T, Bayer, Block, Mastercard, Rivian, and Unilever use it for workloads ranging from ETL pipelines and BI dashboards to fraud models and generative AI applications. Its main rival is Snowflake, with the cloud providers' own data stacks as the other big competitors. The company is headquartered in San Francisco, California.

Snowflake Inc.: Snowflake Inc. (NYSE: SNOW) is a cloud data platform company that lists Bozeman, Montana as its headquarters and operates as a distributed company. Its core idea, separating data storage from the compute used to query it, let customers scale analytics on demand instead of buying fixed hardware from vendors such as Teradata or Oracle. The platform now spans data warehousing, data engineering, applications, data sharing and AI agents, and served 828 customers with more than $1 million in trailing 12-month product revenue as of July 31, 2026.

Business Models: How Databricks, Inc. and Snowflake Inc. Make Money

Databricks, Inc. and Snowflake Inc. pursue distinct approaches to generating revenue, and understanding how each company operates is the foundation of any fair comparison between Databricks, Inc. and Snowflake Inc..

Databricks, Inc. business model: Databricks makes money by charging for compute consumed on its platform, measured in Databricks Units (DBUs). Customers usually sign annual or multi-year committed-spend contracts and then draw them down as their engineers run pipelines, SQL queries, model training, model serving, and AI agents. There is no flat seat fee for most workloads, so revenue rises as data volumes and AI usage grow. Databricks runs on AWS, Microsoft Azure (where it is sold as the first-party Azure Databricks service), and Google Cloud, and customers can often pay for it through existing cloud commitments. Newer products such as Lakebase (serverless Postgres), Genie, and Agent Bricks extend the same consumption model to operational databases and AI agents.

Snowflake Inc. business model: Snowflake runs a consumption-based cloud data platform on top of AWS, Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud. Customers are billed for compute (virtual warehouses, Snowpark, Cortex AI and other services, metered in credits), for storage per terabyte per month, and for data transfer. Most large customers sign multi-year capacity commitments and draw them down as they use the platform; revenue is recognized on consumption, not on contract signing. Professional services and training are a small share of revenue. The Snowflake Marketplace and secure data sharing let customers exchange live data without copying it, which adds workloads and keeps data on the platform.

Competitive Advantage: Databricks, Inc. vs Snowflake Inc.

The durability of a company's moat often decides long-term winners. Here is how the competitive advantages of Databricks, Inc. stack up against those of Snowflake Inc..

Databricks, Inc. competitive advantage: Databricks' advantage comes from its link to open-source software, in particular Apache Spark. Its founders created Spark, the open-source data processing engine used across the technology industry, and Databricks' paid platform is built to run Spark faster and more efficiently. Its Lakehouse architecture lets companies run both standard business reporting and AI models on the same data, which removes the need for separate data systems.

Snowflake Inc. competitive advantage: Snowflake's main advantages are that it runs the same platform across AWS, Azure and Google Cloud, which reduces lock-in to a single hyperscaler, and that storage and compute scale independently, so customers pay only for compute while it runs. Secure data sharing and the Snowflake Marketplace let separate organizations query the same live data without copying it, which creates network effects. Growing support for Apache Iceberg open tables and built-in AI services (Cortex) aims to keep data and AI workloads on the platform.

Growth Strategy: Where Databricks, Inc. and Snowflake Inc. Are Headed

Future prospects matter as much as current results. The growth strategies below explain how Databricks, Inc. and Snowflake Inc. each plan to expand from here.

Databricks, Inc. growth strategy: Databricks is expanding from analytics into the systems that enterprise AI agents run on. The 2026 funding is earmarked for three products: Lakebase, a serverless Postgres database for agents built on the 2025 acquisition of Neon; Genie, an AI coworker that answers business questions from governed data; and Unity AI Gateway, which routes requests across AI models with governance and cost controls. Acquisitions fill gaps quickly: Panther for security analytics (announced June 2026), Electric for local Postgres sync (August 2026), and Row Zero to add a governed spreadsheet to Genie (September 2026). Alongside this, Databricks keeps pushing its Lakehouse warehousing product to take SQL workloads from legacy and cloud data warehouses.

Snowflake Inc. growth strategy: Under CEO Sridhar Ramaswamy, Snowflake is positioning itself as the data layer for enterprise AI agents. It is adding AI services (Cortex AI, Cortex Agents and Snowflake Intelligence), developer tools (Snowpark, Streamlit, Snowflake Postgres) and open-format support (Apache Iceberg). In 2026 it bought Observe for AI-powered observability, agreed to acquire Natoma for governed agent connectivity via the Model Context Protocol, and acquired TensorStax for agentic data engineering. The raised FY2027 product revenue target of $6.07B (+36%) reflects this push.

Financial Picture: Databricks, Inc. vs Snowflake Inc.

A closer look at the financial trajectory of Databricks, Inc. and Snowflake Inc. rounds out the comparison.

Databricks, Inc.: Databricks is private and does not publish full audited financial statements for investors. It reported more than $1.6 billion of revenue for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2024. Its later disclosures are annualized revenue run-rates, not completed fiscal-year revenue: above $5.4 billion in Q4 FY2026 and above $7 billion in Q2 FY2027, the quarter ended July 31, 2026. The August 2026 release said the latest run-rate was growing more than 80% year over year and adjusted free cash flow had been positive over the trailing 12 months; it did not disclose GAAP net income. Within the broader run-rate, Databricks reported more than $1.5 billion for Lakehouse data warehousing and more than $100 million for Lakebase. It reported more than 1,000 customers consuming at over a $1 million annual run-rate and more than 100 at over $10 million. Its announced financing valuations rose from $62 billion in December 2024 to $134 billion in February 2026 and $190 billion in August 2026. Those are private funding-round valuations, not a public market capitalization.

Snowflake Inc.: Snowflake has grown from $96.7M of revenue in fiscal 2019 to $4.684B in fiscal 2026 while remaining GAAP unprofitable, largely because of heavy stock-based compensation. FY2026 revenue grew 29% and the GAAP net loss was $1.332B. Growth accelerated in fiscal 2027: Q2 revenue was $1.55B (+35%), product revenue $1.49B (+37%, the third straight quarter of acceleration), net revenue retention 126%, and non-GAAP operating margin 15.3%. GAAP operating loss for the quarter was $263M. On September 28, 2026 the company announced a $3.5B offering of 0.00% convertible senior notes due 2029 and 2031. Snowflake Inc. is an absolute titan in the cloud computing data warehousing industry, sustaining a massive market valuation generally exceeding $50 billion.

Company-Specific SWOT Notes

Databricks, Inc.

Strength

Control and stewardship of Apache Spark, Delta Lake, MLflow, and Unity Catalog provide Databricks with an unbeatable developer mindshare and ecosystem moat.

Strength

Unlike legacy data warehouses limited to structured SQL, Databricks natively processes unstructured text, video, and audio required for frontier generative AI.

Weakness

Historically designed for technical data engineers and data scientists, Databricks has had to invest heavily to achieve parity with simple SQL-first business analyst tools.

Weakness

Running atop underlying hyperscaler infrastructure requires continuous engineering optimization to maintain high gross margins across AWS, Azure, and GCP.

Opportunity

Enterprises increasingly reject sending proprietary data to third-party closed APIs, creating large demand for Databricks Mosaic AI private training clusters.

Threat

Snowflake's expansion into data engineering (Snowpark), open formats (Apache Iceberg), and generative AI (Cortex) represents direct competitive pressure.

Snowflake Inc.

Strength

Snowflake's proprietary C++ codebase allows a single logical data warehouse to span Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud Platform simultaneously, providing enterprise customers with negotiating leverage and eliminating the prohibitive egress

Strength

Snowflake's core architectural decision to physically separate compute and storage allows enterprise clients to scale highly intensive queries instantly without paying for unnecessary storage.

Weakness

Snowflake's consumption-based pricing model creates a unique vulnerability to short-term revenue volatility, as customers facing macroeconomic headwinds can instantly reduce their spend by implementing hard spending limits and optimizing their queries, directl

Weakness

Because Snowflake does not own its own data centers, it relies entirely on the infrastructure of AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud—the exact same companies that are aggressively building rival products.

Opportunity

The rapid adoption of enterprise artificial intelligence presents an opportunity for Snowflake to capture the data engineering and data science workloads that have historically been dominated by specialized lakehouse platforms, using its secure, governed Data

Threat

Amazon Web Services, Microsoft, and Google are bundling their native analytics services with their core infrastructure contracts, offering deep discounts and integrated billing that make it economically difficult for Snowflake to compete on pure price for comm

Factual Scorecard

CategoryResultWhy
Same-period Revenue ScaleNot comparableDatabricks, Inc.: $2.6B (FY2025). Snowflake Inc.: $4.7B (FY2026). Different or missing fiscal periods prevent a like-for-like ranking.
Founded EarlierSnowflake Inc.Databricks, Inc. was founded in 2013; Snowflake Inc. was founded in 2012.
Verdict

Comparison Takeaway: Databricks, Inc. vs Snowflake Inc.

Databricks' self-reported revenue run-rate growth of over 80% in the quarter ended July 31, 2026 is more than double Snowflake's 35% total revenue growth in the same period, and Databricks' $1.5 billion-plus Lakehouse SQL warehousing run-rate, growing over 100%, shows it taking share directly in Snowflake's original SQL-warehouse territory. Snowflake counters with real, audited numbers and a narrowing loss: its fiscal second-quarter 2027 GAAP net loss shrank to $191.7 million from $297.9 million a year earlier, and non-GAAP operating margin rose to 15.3%. Both are spending aggressively on AI infrastructure and tuck-in acquisitions: Snowflake bought Observe, agreed to buy Natoma, and bought TensorStax in 2026 to build agentic-AI governance, while Databricks bought Panther, Electric, and Row Zero in the same year to extend Lakebase and Genie into security and spreadsheets. On pure momentum, Databricks is winning — faster growth, a higher valuation, and a product line now reaching into SQL warehousing — but Snowflake's advantage is that every one of its numbers is independently audited and filed with the SEC, which Databricks' self-reported run-rate and valuation are not.

Methodology and sourcing reviewed by Swet Parvadiya. No date is shown unless this comparison has its own editorial review date.

Frequently Asked Questions: Databricks, Inc. vs Snowflake Inc.

Does Databricks make more money than Snowflake?

By self-reported run-rate, yes: Databricks says its revenue run-rate passed $7 billion in the quarter ended July 31, 2026, versus Snowflake's audited $4.684 billion in revenue for fiscal 2026 (ended January 31, 2026). The comparison isn't exact, though, since Snowflake's figure is GAAP revenue filed with the SEC while Databricks' is an unaudited, annualized run-rate disclosed only in press releases.

Which is more profitable, Snowflake or Databricks?

Neither has disclosed a GAAP profit. Snowflake reported a $1.332 billion net loss for fiscal 2026, narrowing to $191.7 million in its fiscal second quarter of 2027 (ended July 31, 2026). Databricks, which is private, does not disclose net income but says it has generated positive adjusted free cash flow over the trailing twelve months as of mid-2026.

Who is the CEO of Databricks, and who runs Snowflake?

Ali Ghodsi has been Databricks' CEO since 2016; he co-founded the company in 2013 after helping create Apache Spark at UC Berkeley. Sridhar Ramaswamy has been Snowflake's CEO since February 2024, succeeding Frank Slootman, after previously running Google's advertising business and co-founding Neeva, which Snowflake acquired in 2023.

Why is Databricks valued higher than Snowflake if it isn't even public?

Investors in Databricks' private funding rounds valued the company at $190 billion on August 13, 2026, based on its reported revenue run-rate growing more than 80% year over year. Snowflake, which trades on the NYSE under ticker SNOW, had a public market capitalization of about $118 billion in late September 2026 — lower because public markets price it on audited, slower-growing GAAP revenue rather than a self-reported run-rate.

Which is bigger overall, Databricks or Snowflake?

By headcount and reported revenue momentum, Databricks is bigger: roughly 14,000 employees versus Snowflake's 9,060 as of January 31, 2026, and a revenue run-rate above $7 billion versus Snowflake's audited $4.684 billion for fiscal 2026. Snowflake remains the only one of the two with real, SEC-filed financial statements, which matters if 'bigger' is meant to be independently verifiable rather than self-reported.

Which company was founded first, Databricks, Inc. or Snowflake Inc.?

Snowflake Inc. was founded in 2012; Databricks, Inc. was founded in 2013.

What revenue did Databricks, Inc. and Snowflake Inc. report?

Databricks, Inc. had $2.6B (FY2025), while Snowflake Inc. had $4.7B (FY2026). The fiscal years differ, so these are not a like-for-like same-period comparison.

How do Databricks, Inc. and Snowflake Inc. make money?

Databricks, Inc.: Databricks makes money by charging for compute consumed on its platform, measured in Databricks Units (DBUs). Snowflake Inc.: Snowflake runs a consumption-based cloud data platform on top of AWS, Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud.

Which is better, Databricks, Inc. or Snowflake Inc.?

There is no evidence-based single winner. Compare Databricks, Inc. and Snowflake Inc. on the same fiscal period and the metric relevant to the question, such as revenue, profitability, growth, product fit, or market value.

Sources & References

Quick Answer

Databricks is larger by growth and by self-reported run-rate: it says revenue run-rate topped $7 billion in the quarter ended July 31, 2026, growing more than 80% year over year, versus Snowflake's audited $4.684 billion in revenue for fiscal 2026 (ended January 31, 2026), up 29%. Databricks is also valued higher despite being private — $190 billion as of August 13, 2026, against Snowflake's roughly $118 billion public market capitalization in late September 2026. Snowflake is the more transparent of the two: it files GAAP financials with the SEC and reported a $1.332 billion net loss for fiscal 2026, while Databricks does not disclose audited net income, saying only that it has generated positive adjusted free cash flow over the trailing twelve months.

Verdict

Databricks' self-reported revenue run-rate growth of over 80% in the quarter ended July 31, 2026 is more than double Snowflake's 35% total revenue growth in the same period, and Databricks' $1.5 billion-plus Lakehouse SQL warehousing run-rate, growing over 100%, shows it taking share directly in Snowflake's original SQL-warehouse territory. Snowflake counters with real, audited numbers and a narrowing loss: its fiscal second-quarter 2027 GAAP net loss shrank to $191.7 million from $297.9 million a year earlier, and non-GAAP operating margin rose to 15.3%. Both are spending aggressively on AI infrastructure and tuck-in acquisitions: Snowflake bought Observe, agreed to buy Natoma, and bought TensorStax in 2026 to build agentic-AI governance, while Databricks bought Panther, Electric, and Row Zero in the same year to extend Lakebase and Genie into security and spreadsheets. On pure momentum, Databricks is winning — faster growth, a higher valuation, and a product line now reaching into SQL warehousing — but Snowflake's advantage is that every one of its numbers is independently audited and filed with the SEC, which Databricks' self-reported run-rate and valuation are not.

Cite This Page

Automatically generated citations for researchers.

APA Format

CorpDigest. (2026). Databricks, Inc. vs Snowflake Inc. Comparison. from https://corpdigest.com/compare/databricks-vs-snowflake

MLA Format

CorpDigest. "Databricks, Inc. vs Snowflake Inc. Comparison." CorpDigest, 2026, https://corpdigest.com/compare/databricks-vs-snowflake.

Chicago Format

CorpDigest. "Databricks, Inc. vs Snowflake Inc. Comparison." CorpDigest. 2026. https://corpdigest.com/compare/databricks-vs-snowflake.

Content is for informational purposes only. Not financial advice. Data sourced from SEC filings, annual reports, and public records. See our full disclaimer and methodology.