Skip to main content

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company vs Novartis AG: Strategic Comparison

Direct Answer

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company had $48.2B (FY2025), while Novartis AG had $56.7B (FY2025). Revenue describes scale, not an overall winner.

Editorial research by Swet Parvadiya. Figures keep each company's fiscal year; amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Sources are listed below.

Share

Key Differences at a Glance

FieldBristol-Myers Squibb CompanyNovartis AG
Latest annual revenue$48.2B (FY2025)$56.7B (FY2025)
Founded18871996
Employees32,50075,267
Market Cap$127.5B$275.3B
HeadquartersUnited StatesSwitzerland
Revenue / Employee$1.48M / employee$753k / employee
Valuation Multiple2.6x P/S4.9x P/S

Strategic Positioning

Business model and competitive context from the cited profiles

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company Strategic Vector

FY2025 Revenue Baseline

The Celgene deal bought time rather than a permanent fix. Revlimid's slide from $12.8 billion in 2021 to $3.0 billion in 2025 consumed much of what the deal added, yet Celgene also brought Reblozyl, Breyanzi, Zeposia and Abecma, which together sold about $4.7 billion in 2025. The same pattern repeats in 2028, so BMS's value rests on whether medicines launched since 2022 can grow faster than Eliquis and Opdivo decline.

Productivity: $1.48M / employee

Novartis AG Strategic Vector

FY2025 Revenue Baseline

Novartis has become a test of whether a pure-play pharma can refill its pipeline through mid-sized acquisitions. At about billion, Avidity was larger than the 2020 Medicines Company purchase, and the HARBOR failure in DM1 shifts the burden of that deal onto its Duchenne and FSHD programs.

Productivity: $753k / employee

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company vs Novartis AG Market Share

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company market share
Eliquis is the best-selling oral anticoagulant worldwide, with $14.4 billion of BMS-reported sales in 2025. Opdivo is the second-largest PD-1 inhibitor behind Merck's Keytruda. In multiple myeloma BMS still sells Revlimid and Pomalyst but is losing share to generics and to CAR-T and bispecific therapies from rivals. About 69 percent of BMS's 2025 revenue came from the United States.
Novartis AG market share
Novartis ranks among the largest pharmaceutical companies by sales, with FY2025 net sales of $54.5 billion, and leads the commercial radioligand therapy market through Pluvicto and Lutathera.

Quick Stats Comparison

MetricBristol-Myers Squibb CompanyNovartis AG
Revenue$48.2B (FY2025)$56.7B (FY2025)
Founded18871996
HeadquartersPrinceton, New JerseyBasel, Switzerland
Market Cap$127.5B$275.3B
Employees32,50075,267
Revenue / Employee$1.48M / employee$753k / employee
Valuation Multiple2.6x P/S4.9x P/S

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company Revenue vs Novartis AG Revenue — Year by Year

YearBristol-Myers Squibb CompanyNovartis AGHigher reported revenue
2025$48.2B$56.7BNovartis AG (approx. USD)
2024$48.3B$51.7BNovartis AG (approx. USD)
2023$45.0B$46.7BNovartis AG (approx. USD)
2022$46.2B$43.5BBristol-Myers Squibb Company (approx. USD)
2021$46.4B$44.0BBristol-Myers Squibb Company (approx. USD)

Business Model Breakdown

Overview: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company vs Novartis AG

This in-depth comparison examines Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Novartis AG across revenue, market value, business model, competitive positioning, and long-term growth strategy. Whether you are researching Bristol-Myers Squibb Company on its own, evaluating Novartis AG, or weighing the two companies side by side, the breakdown below highlights where each company leads and where the gap between Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Novartis AG is widest.

On the headline numbers, annual revenue is $48.2B (FY2025) for Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and $56.7B (FY2025) for Novartis AG, while their respective market capitalizations stand at $127.5B and $275.3B. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company is headquartered in United States and Novartis AG in Switzerland, and those different home markets shape how each company competes.

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS) is a U.S. biopharmaceutical company headquartered in Princeton, New Jersey, and listed on the New York Stock Exchange as BMY. It develops and sells prescription medicines for cancer, blood disorders, immune diseases, heart disease and schizophrenia. Its best-known products are Eliquis, the anticoagulant it sells with Pfizer, and Opdivo, a PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor. With $48.2 billion of 2025 revenue and a market value of about $127 billion at the end of September 2026, it is one of the largest U.S. drugmakers by sales. The massive biopharmaceutical titan was formed in New York City, New York through the 1989 mega-merger of two historic drug companies, eventually becoming an absolute powerhouse in modern cancer immunology.

Novartis AG: Novartis is one of the world's largest drugmakers by sales and the larger of Basel's two pharmaceutical groups alongside Roche. Created by the 1996 merger of Ciba-Geigy and Sandoz, it shed eye care (Alcon, 2019) and generics (Sandoz, 2023) and now sells only innovative medicines. Its best-known products include Entresto for heart failure, Cosentyx for psoriasis and arthritis, Kisqali for breast cancer, Kesimpta for multiple sclerosis and Pluvicto for prostate cancer. The company is headquartered in Basel, Switzerland.

Business Models: How Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Novartis AG Make Money

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Novartis AG pursue distinct approaches to generating revenue, and understanding how each company operates is the foundation of any fair comparison between Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Novartis AG.

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company business model: BMS discovers, licenses or buys drug candidates, takes them through clinical trials, and sells approved medicines under patent protection to wholesalers, specialty pharmacies and hospitals. Net product sales were $46.8 billion of the $48.2 billion total in 2025; alliance, royalty and other revenues made up the remaining $1.4 billion, including royalties from Merck on Winrevair. Eliquis is developed and sold with Pfizer, which shares its costs and profits. About 69 percent of 2025 revenue came from the United States, so U.S. pricing policy matters more to BMS than to most European rivals. Because every patent runs out, the model depends on replacing revenue: BMS paid $74 billion for Celgene in 2019, $13.1 billion for MyoKardia in 2020 and about $23 billion for Karuna, Mirati and RayzeBio in early 2024.

Novartis AG business model: Novartis earns almost all of its revenue by selling patented prescription medicines to wholesalers, hospitals, pharmacies and national health systems in about 140 countries. FY2025 net sales of $54.5 billion came from four core areas (cardiovascular-renal-metabolic, immunology, neuroscience and oncology) plus established brands. The model depends on reinvesting roughly a fifth of sales into R&D and acquisitions so that new launches replace drugs losing exclusivity. Since the 2023 Sandoz spin-off, Novartis has no generics business; it also earns smaller "other revenues" (about $2.1 billion in 2025) from royalties and milestones.

Competitive Advantage: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company vs Novartis AG

The durability of a company's moat often decides long-term winners. Here is how the competitive advantages of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company stack up against those of Novartis AG.

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company competitive advantage: BMS's advantage is its expertise in oncology and its large commercial and regulatory organization. Developing a cancer immunotherapy is complex, and winning approval from regulators and getting doctors to prescribe it requires an established global sales and regulatory team. Smaller biotech companies often lack that infrastructure, so they partner with or sell to a company like BMS to bring their discoveries to market.

Novartis AG competitive advantage: Novartis's edge rests on scale in late-stage development and specialist platforms that are hard to copy. It owns the leading commercial radioligand therapy franchise (Pluvicto and Lutathera) along with dedicated isotope manufacturing sites in the US and Europe, an siRNA cardiovascular drug (Leqvio), and, since February 2026, Avidity Biosciences' antibody-oligonucleotide conjugate platform. Its FY2025 core operating margin of about 40% and free cash flow of $17.6 billion fund buybacks, dividends and bolt-on deals simultaneously.

Growth Strategy: Where Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Novartis AG Are Headed

Future prospects matter as much as current results. The growth strategies below explain how Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Novartis AG each plan to expand from here.

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company growth strategy: BMS is pursuing growth on three fronts. First, scaling the Growth Portfolio (Opdivo Qvantig, Reblozyl, Camzyos, Breyanzi, Opdualag, Cobenfy and others), which rose 17 percent to $26.4 billion in 2025 and 15 percent to $7.56 billion in the second quarter of 2026. Second, buying and licensing late-stage science: Mirati ($4.8 billion plus a contingent value right of up to $1 billion), RayzeBio ($4.1 billion) and Karuna ($14 billion) closed in early 2024; a June 2025 deal with BioNTech for the bispecific BNT327 carried $1.5 billion upfront and up to $11.1 billion in total; and Orbital Therapeutics was bought for $1.5 billion in October 2025 for in vivo CAR-T in autoimmune disease. Third, cost cuts: a $1.5 billion savings program announced in 2024 was extended in 2025 with a further $2 billion targeted by the end of 2027.

Novartis AG growth strategy: Novartis concentrates on four therapeutic areas and on the US, its largest market. It pairs internal research with bolt-on acquisitions of late-stage or platform biotechs: Chinook (2023, kidney disease), MorphoSys (2024, myelofibrosis), Kate Therapeutics (2024, gene therapy capsids) and Avidity Biosciences (closed February 27, 2026, about $12 billion, neuromuscular RNA medicines). It is also expanding US manufacturing, including radioligand production capacity.

Financial Picture: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company vs Novartis AG

A closer look at the financial trajectory of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Novartis AG rounds out the comparison.

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Revenue grew from $19.4 billion in 2016 to $42.5 billion in 2020 as Celgene's sales were added, and has stayed between $45.0 billion and $48.3 billion since 2021. Net earnings are far less stable because BMS expenses acquired in-process R&D: the $11.4 billion MyoKardia charge produced a $9.0 billion net loss in 2020, and the Karuna charge produced an $8.9 billion loss in 2024. Cash generation is steadier, with free cash flow of about $12.8 billion in 2025. That cash funds a dividend raised for a 17th straight year in February 2026, to $0.63 a quarter, and debt reduction, from $51.2 billion at the end of 2024 to $47.2 billion a year later. On July 30, 2026 BMS raised its 2026 revenue guidance to $49.0 to $50.0 billion, from $46.0 to $47.5 billion, after second-quarter revenue rose 6 percent to $12.97 billion. Bristol Myers Squibb is a dominant force in global biopharmaceuticals, sustaining a massive market valuation that regularly exceeds $100 billion.

Novartis AG: Novartis grew FY2025 net sales 8% to $54.5 billion with a core operating margin above 40% and free cash flow of $17.6 billion. 2026 is a reset year: US generics of Entresto and Promacta cut Q1 2026 net sales 5% at constant currencies to $13.1 billion and core operating income 14%. Q2 2026 net sales rose 1% cc to $14.4 billion with a 41.2% core margin, though net income fell 19%. Management guides for low single-digit sales growth and a low single-digit decline in core operating income for 2026 at constant currencies. Novartis is a Swiss multinational pharmaceutical corporation with a market valuation generally exceeding $200 billion.

Company-Specific SWOT Notes

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company

Strength

Eliquis ($14.4 billion) and Opdivo ($10.0 billion) produced about half of 2025 revenue and help fund roughly $12.8 billion of annual free cash flow, a dividend raised 17 years running and continued deal-making.

Strength

Newer brands such as Opdivo Qvantig, Reblozyl, Camzyos, Breyanzi, Opdualag and Cobenfy grew 17 percent to $26.4 billion in 2025 and were nearly 60 percent of revenue by the second quarter of 2026.

Weakness

Eliquis and Opdivo both lose U.S. exclusivity in 2028, and Revlimid, Pomalyst and Sprycel are already losing sales to generics.

Weakness

The Celgene, MyoKardia, Karuna, Mirati and RayzeBio deals left about $47.2 billion of debt at the end of 2025 and produced GAAP net losses in 2020 and 2024 from in-process R&D charges.

Opportunity

Cobenfy could add Alzheimer's disease psychosis if the ADEPT trials succeed, and BMS has positions in radiopharmaceuticals (RayzeBio), in vivo CAR-T for autoimmune disease (Orbital) and PD-(L)1 x VEGF bispecifics (BNT327 with BioNTech).

Threat

About 69 percent of revenue is from the United States.

Novartis AG

Strength

After Sandoz and Alcon separations Novartis is concentrated around branded, higher-margin medicines and specialty platforms.

Strength

Novartis absolutely dominates the highly lucrative, cutting-edge gene therapy market (with drugs like Zolgensma), proving it can successfully develop and monetize incredibly complex, one-time cures.

Weakness

Large franchises can lose sales quickly when exclusivity ends or payers switch patients to generics and biosimilars.

Weakness

The impending, massive patent expiration of Entresto (its multi-billion dollar heart failure drug) threatens to wipe out an enormous percentage of the company's highly profitable revenue.

Opportunity

Radioligand therapy, oncology, immunology, and cardiovascular launches can offset mature-product pressure.

Threat

Drug-price controls, reimbursement restrictions, safety findings, and clinical failures can materially affect growth.

Factual Scorecard

CategoryResultWhy
Same-period Revenue ScaleNovartis AG$48.2B (FY2025) versus $56.7B (FY2025); the higher figure is identified after approximate USD conversion.
Founded EarlierBristol-Myers Squibb CompanyBristol-Myers Squibb Company was founded in 1887; Novartis AG was founded in 1996.
Verdict

Comparison Takeaway: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company vs Novartis AG

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company had $48.2B (FY2025), while Novartis AG had $56.7B (FY2025). Revenue describes scale, not an overall winner. Compare the same reporting period and the metric relevant to the question—revenue, profitability, growth, product fit, or market value—rather than treating them as one composite score.

Methodology and sourcing reviewed by Swet Parvadiya. No date is shown unless this comparison has its own editorial review date.

Frequently Asked Questions: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company vs Novartis AG

Which company was founded first, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company or Novartis AG?

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company was founded in 1887; Novartis AG was founded in 1996.

What revenue did Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Novartis AG report?

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company had $48.2B (FY2025), while Novartis AG had $56.7B (FY2025). These figures describe revenue scale; they do not by themselves determine an overall winner.

How do Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Novartis AG make money?

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: BMS discovers, licenses or buys drug candidates, takes them through clinical trials, and sells approved medicines under patent protection to wholesalers, specialty pharmacies and hospitals. Novartis AG: Novartis earns almost all of its revenue by selling patented prescription medicines to wholesalers, hospitals, pharmacies and national health systems in about 140 countries.

Which is better, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company or Novartis AG?

There is no evidence-based single winner. Compare Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Novartis AG on the same fiscal period and the metric relevant to the question, such as revenue, profitability, growth, product fit, or market value.

Sources & References

Cite This Page

Automatically generated citations for researchers.

APA Format

CorpDigest. (2026). Bristol-Myers Squibb Company vs Novartis AG Comparison. from https://corpdigest.com/compare/bristol-myers-squibb-vs-novartis

MLA Format

CorpDigest. "Bristol-Myers Squibb Company vs Novartis AG Comparison." CorpDigest, 2026, https://corpdigest.com/compare/bristol-myers-squibb-vs-novartis.

Chicago Format

CorpDigest. "Bristol-Myers Squibb Company vs Novartis AG Comparison." CorpDigest. 2026. https://corpdigest.com/compare/bristol-myers-squibb-vs-novartis.

Content is for informational purposes only. Not financial advice. Data sourced from SEC filings, annual reports, and public records. See our full disclaimer and methodology.