TotalEnergies SE vs Uber Technologies, Inc.: Strategic Comparison
Key Differences at a Glance
| Field | TotalEnergies SE | Uber Technologies, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $182.3B | $52.0B |
| Founded | 1924 | 2009 |
| Employees | 101,513 | 34,000 |
| Market Cap | $165.0B | $177.2B |
| Headquarters | France | United States |
Quick Stats Comparison
| Metric | TotalEnergies SE | Uber Technologies, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $182.3B | $52.0B |
| Founded | 1924 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | Paris, France | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Market Cap | $165.0B | $177.2B |
| Employees | 101,513 | 34,000 |
TotalEnergies SE Revenue vs Uber Technologies, Inc. Revenue — Year by Year
| Year | TotalEnergies SE | Uber Technologies, Inc. | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $182.3B | $52.0B | TotalEnergies SE |
| 2024 | $195.6B | $44.0B | TotalEnergies SE |
| 2023 | $218.9B | $37.3B | TotalEnergies SE |
| 2022 | N/A | $31.9B | Uber Technologies, Inc. |
| 2021 | N/A | $17.5B | Uber Technologies, Inc. |
Business Model Breakdown
Overview: TotalEnergies SE vs Uber Technologies, Inc.
This in-depth comparison examines TotalEnergies SE and Uber Technologies, Inc. across revenue, market value, business model, competitive positioning, and long-term growth strategy. Whether you are researching TotalEnergies SE on its own, evaluating Uber Technologies, Inc., or weighing the two companies side by side, the breakdown below highlights where each company leads and where the gap between TotalEnergies SE and Uber Technologies, Inc. is widest.
On the headline numbers, TotalEnergies SE reports annual revenue of $182.3B against $52.0B for Uber Technologies, Inc., while their respective market capitalizations stand at $165.0B and $177.2B. TotalEnergies SE is headquartered in France and Uber Technologies, Inc. operates from United States, and those different home markets shape how each company competes.
TotalEnergies SE: TotalEnergies reported $182.344 billion in 2025 revenues from sales and $13.127 billion in net income attributable to TotalEnergies. The company remains a multi-energy major: oil and gas production, LNG, refining, marketing, electricity, and renewables all sit inside one capital-allocation system led by CEO Patrick Pouyanne.
Uber Technologies, Inc.: Uber reported FY2025 revenue of $52.017 billion, net income attributable to Uber of $10.053 billion, and approximately 34,000 employees. Dara Khosrowshahi is CEO. The company operates Mobility, Delivery, Freight, advertising, subscriptions, and partner marketplace services.
Business Models: How TotalEnergies SE and Uber Technologies, Inc. Make Money
TotalEnergies SE and Uber Technologies, Inc. pursue distinct approaches to generating revenue, and understanding how each company operates is the foundation of any fair comparison between TotalEnergies SE and Uber Technologies, Inc..
TotalEnergies SE business model: TotalEnergies makes money from an integrated energy chain: exploration and production, LNG, refining and chemicals, marketing and services, electricity generation, power trading, renewable assets, and customer energy services.
Uber Technologies, Inc. business model: Uber makes money from mobility service fees, delivery marketplace fees, freight brokerage, advertising, Uber One subscriptions, financial partnerships, and platform services. The company does not own most of the vehicles, restaurants, or freight assets on the platform; it monetizes demand routing, pricing, payments, matching, merchant access, and marketplace data.
Competitive Advantage: TotalEnergies SE vs Uber Technologies, Inc.
The durability of a company's moat often decides long-term winners. Here is how the competitive advantages of TotalEnergies SE stack up against those of Uber Technologies, Inc..
TotalEnergies SE competitive advantage: TotalEnergies has an integrated LNG platform, upstream assets across multiple basins, downstream and marketing positions, and a growing power portfolio. Its advantage is breadth across molecules, refined products, and electrons.
Uber Technologies, Inc. competitive advantage: Uber's advantage comes from local marketplace liquidity, brand recognition, routing data, payments, driver and courier networks, merchant relationships, subscriptions, and cross-sell between Mobility and Delivery.
Growth Strategy: Where TotalEnergies SE and Uber Technologies, Inc. Are Headed
Future prospects matter as much as current results. The growth strategies below explain how TotalEnergies SE and Uber Technologies, Inc. each plan to expand from here.
TotalEnergies SE growth strategy: TotalEnergies' strategy centers on low-cost oil and gas production, LNG integration, disciplined downstream operations, renewable power capacity, electricity customers, and cash returns to shareholders.
Uber Technologies, Inc. growth strategy: Uber's growth strategy is focused on marketplace liquidity, cross-platform engagement, advertising, subscriptions, delivery scale, autonomous-vehicle partnerships, and disciplined unit economics. The pending Delivery Hero offer would extend delivery density and international market reach if it closes in the second half of 2027.
Financial Picture: TotalEnergies SE vs Uber Technologies, Inc.
A closer look at the financial trajectory of TotalEnergies SE and Uber Technologies, Inc. rounds out the comparison.
TotalEnergies SE: TotalEnergies reported $182.344 billion in 2025 revenues from sales, down from $195.610 billion in 2024 as hydrocarbon prices declined. Net income attributable to TotalEnergies was $13.127 billion, while adjusted net income was $15.587 billion and adjusted EBITDA was $40.555 billion.
Uber Technologies, Inc.: Uber reported FY2025 revenue of $52.017 billion, up 18% from FY2024. Net income attributable to Uber was $10.053 billion, gross bookings were $193.454 billion, trips were 13.567 billion, and MAPCs reached 202 million. The company had approximately 34,000 employees at year-end 2025.
Company-Specific SWOT Notes
TotalEnergies SE
TotalEnergies controls over 4,000 service stations and the majority of the premium lubricants market across 40 African countries, providing a stable, high-margin, recession-proof baseline of free cash flow that is completely decoupled from European refining ma
The company is the second-largest global player in liquefied natural gas, controlling a portfolio of long-term upstream production contracts in Qatar, Australia, and the US, combined with a massive midstream shipping fleet and downstream terminals.
The company faces intense regulatory hostility in its home markets of France and Belgium, where the aggressive expansion of the EU Emissions Trading System and the implementation of windfall profit taxes directly confiscate the cash flows generated by its inte
While the African downstream network is highly profitable, it exposes the company to significant geopolitical, security, and foreign exchange risks, as operations in the Sahel region and sub-Saharan Africa are increasingly threatened by political instability a
TotalEnergies is deploying over $5 billion annually to develop utility-scale solar and offshore wind projects, with a target to reach 100 gigawatts of renewable capacity by 2030.
ExxonMobil and Chevron have executed a strategic retreat from the European retail and renewable power markets to focus exclusively on high-return, low-cost unconventional oil production in the Permian Basin and the deepwater Gulf of Mexico.
Uber Technologies, Inc.
Uber's driver, courier, rider, merchant, and payments density reinforces itself city by city.
Labor classification, insurance, safety rules, and city-level regulation can raise platform costs.
Uber One, retail media, grocery, delivery, and the pending Delivery Hero offer can broaden revenue per user.
Waymo, local super-apps, DoorDash, Lyft, and regulation can weaken Uber's marketplace position.
Head-to-Head Scorecard
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Scale | TotalEnergies SE | TotalEnergies SE reports the larger revenue base ($182.3B), which serves as a core operational scale signal. |
| Profitability Potential | Comparable | Both organizations prioritize market penetration or are at equivalent reporting tiers. |
| Company Age | TotalEnergies SE | Founded in 1924 vs 2009. The earlier pioneer typically commands longer historical institutional legacy. |
| Innovation Moat | Uber Technologies, Inc. | Higher aggregate count of major acquisitions and key R&D releases indicates a more active technology absorption velocity. |
| Scale (Employees) | TotalEnergies SE | A significantly larger reported workforce supports enhanced global distribution capability. |
| Market Cap | Uber Technologies, Inc. | Higher public valuation denotes greater forward-looking investor conviction in earnings potential. |
| Future Outlook | Tied | Strategic auditing assesses that both maintain defensive leadership vectors within their core market clusters. |
Who Wins Each Category?
TotalEnergies SE reports the larger revenue base ($182.3B), which serves as a core operational scale signal.
Both organizations prioritize market penetration or are at equivalent reporting tiers.
Founded in 1924 vs 2009. The earlier pioneer typically commands longer historical institutional legacy.
Higher aggregate count of major acquisitions and key R&D releases indicates a more active technology absorption velocity.
A significantly larger reported workforce supports enhanced global distribution capability.
Who Wins: TotalEnergies SE or Uber Technologies, Inc.?
Reviewed by Swet Parvadiya, May 2026 - Author Profile
Our analysts compile business strategy profiles from public financial filings, press releases, and analyst reports. Each profile is reviewed for accuracy before publication by our editorial desk and updated on a rolling basis.
Frequently Asked Questions: TotalEnergies SE vs Uber Technologies, Inc.
Is TotalEnergies SE better than Uber Technologies, Inc.?
Verdict: Between TotalEnergies SE and Uber Technologies, Inc., TotalEnergies SE is the stronger overall option based on higher annual revenue. The decision still depends on which factors matter most for your needs, but on the weight of the evidence above, TotalEnergies SE comes out ahead in this TotalEnergies SE vs Uber Technologies, Inc. comparison.
Who earns more — TotalEnergies SE or Uber Technologies, Inc.?
TotalEnergies SE earns more with $182.3B in annual revenue versus Uber Technologies, Inc.'s $52.0B. TotalEnergies SE leads on total revenue based on latest verified figures.
Which company has higher revenue — TotalEnergies SE or Uber Technologies, Inc.?
TotalEnergies SE reported $182.3B, while Uber Technologies, Inc. reported $52.0B. The revenue leader is TotalEnergies SE based on latest verified figures.
TotalEnergies SE revenue vs Uber Technologies, Inc. revenue — which is higher?
TotalEnergies SE revenue: $182.3B. Uber Technologies, Inc. revenue: $52.0B. TotalEnergies SE has the larger revenue base of the two companies.
Sources & References
- TotalEnergies SE Corporate Website
- TotalEnergies SE Annual Report 2025 - Revenue and Financial Data
- totalenergies.com
- sec.gov
- totalenergies.com
- SEC EDGAR: Uber Technologies, Inc. Annual Filings (10-K, 8-K)
- Uber Technologies, Inc. Corporate Website
- Uber Technologies, Inc. Annual Report 2025 - Revenue and Financial Data
- sec.gov
- investor.uber.com
- investor.uber.com
- uber.com
- uber.com